Writ petition seeking a direction to police to register a crime against respondent No.5 was dismissed after counsel submitted that the cause no longer survives. Interlocutory applications were closed and no costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
m
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 40754 OF 2016
Between:
Vabilishetty Krishna Murthy, S/o V. Ranga Rao, Aged about years, R/o Appanapalli Village, Mamidi Kuduru Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh State.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent police in not registering crime against the respondent No.5 is arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted and uncalled for apart from being violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass
1L
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 50197 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent police to register a crime against the respondent No.5
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. K SAI KRISHNA MOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME (AP)
Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : --
The Court made the following Order:
1
-x.
APHC010052652016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH f EfiH AT AMARAVATI [3310] il'J (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 40754/2016
Between:
Vabilishetty Krishna Murthy,
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thecause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above subrpission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. shall stands As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, closed.
/
Sd/- M. SRINIVAS assistant REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
SSR
rRTMTNAT. SECTION
HIGH COURT
DATED: 02/04/2024
ORDER
WP.No.40754 of 2016
WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
s 18 OCT m m
Co
Current Section
pAT c
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vabilishetty Krishna Murthy
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District
The Divisional Superintendent of Police, Amalapuram
The Station House Officer, Razole Police Station
Kota Rajesh
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
