This judgment is a one-line order dismissing a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a Ph.D. guide registration for default due to non-appearance by the petitioner.
The Writ Petition was dismissed for default. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 34094 OF 2016
Between:
Donipati Rojasri, D/o. Krishna Murthy, R/o. D.No.60-29-61, Janatha Colony Mallapuram, Visakapatnam-530011.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent no.1 in the cancellation of Registration of Ph.D. course through the Proceedings No. AUCST/SG(3)/2016 Dated 10-08-2016 issued by Respondent No:1 is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural
r-
justice and set aside consequently direct the respondent to allot the guide to the petitioner, same.
I.A, NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 45718 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supportofthewritpetition,the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing oftheaboveW.PNo. 34094*of 2016 by fixing an early date, in the interestofjustice
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 42056 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supportofthewritpetition,the High Court may be pleased to SUSPEND the cancellationofRegistrationof Ph.D. course through the Proceedings No. AUCST/SG(3)/2016Dated 1008-2016 issued by Respondent No;1, pending disposaloftheabovewrit petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. S S PRAKASH
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 &5; SRI. V SAIKUMAR(SCFOR ANU)
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010021812016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO; 34094/2016
Between:
Donipati Rojasri
...PETITIONER
AND
The Principal Convener Brs and Others
...RESPONDENT{S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
l.S S PRAKASH
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
r
ORDER;
Earlier, when the matter was taken on 22.03.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
- Even today also when the matter was called, there is no representation on behalf of petitioners. It indicates that the Writ Petitioners are not interested to prosecute the matter. Hence,this courtisleft with no other option except to dismiss the Writ Petition fordefault.
- Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
Consequently miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in the Writ
Petition, shall also stand closed.
SD/-G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
r
csb
HIGH COURT
DATED:26/03/2024
ORDER
WP.No.34094 of 2016
^ o'
C' -JPOV
>,g 19 nr.T 202'i
u4>
VX-S'
,££?spatc
DISMISSING THE WP FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
Donipati Rojasri
The Principal & Convener (BRS), College Of science & Technology Andhra University - Visakhapatnam
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
