Writ petition concerning mines and geology was taken up for hearing; counsel stated the cause did not survive. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3310]
APHC010046472015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 33805/2015
Between:
Sri Y.peddi Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.G RAJA BABU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER :
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr J.Santhi Kiran, learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr G.Raja Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands
closed.
_________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
Date: 23.12.2024 TM
Sri Y.peddi Reddy
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
