The High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati dismissed a writ petition as infructuous upon the counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives. Pending miscellaneous applications were closed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010251582017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
MONDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 32687/2017
Between:
Machanuru Sreenivasulu Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.V R REDDY KOVVURI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
3.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following Order:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.N.Rupeswar Reddy,
learned counsel representing Mr.V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, learned counsel for the
petitioner, submits that,the cause in the present writ petition does not survive,
and it has become infructuous.
Infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
2
closed.
__________________________ Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J
BMS
Machanuru Sreenivasulu Reddy
The State Of Andhra Pradesh
K. MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
