Writ petition challenging an order of the Director of Mines & Geology affecting the petitioner's mining lease was dismissed for non-prosecution as there was no representation for the petitioner. Pending interlocutory applications were closed and no costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 36145 OF 2016
Between:
S. Subba Raju, son of Subba Raju, aged about 65 years, Occ; Business, resident of H.No. 20/3/19, Siva Jyothi Nagar, Tirupati, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, especially a writ of Mandamus and set aside the impugned order of the second respondent in his proceedings No.39015/R5-2/2011 dated 4.6.2016 as being arbitrary.
unconstitutional, null and void and consequently allow the petitioner to continue his mining operations in the area leased out to him.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 44537 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings No. 39015/R5-2/2011dated4.6.2016 issued by the second respondent herein by consequently allow the petitioner to continue his mining operations in the area leased outtohim
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. Y N VIVEKANANDA
Counsel for the Respondents No.s 2&3 : GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY (AP) Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 : GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE (AP)
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010287832016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH 7^: AT AMARAVATI 0 (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
MONDAY .THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 36145/2016
Between:
S. Subba Raju, ...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.Y N VIVEKANANDA
Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY (AP)
2.GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER;
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. So, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter.
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall
stands closed.
Sd/- G.HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
S N OFFICER
To,
MSST
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.36145 of 2016
i 2 3 JAN 2C:j
Co
Current Section . ^
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 4.6.2016 cancelling/stopping the petitioner's mining lease operations should be set aside.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Subba Raju
The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Secretary, Industries & Commerce Department
The Director of Mines & Geology, Hyderabad
The Assistant Director of Mines & Geology, Kadapa
Union of India, Ministry of Mines represented by Secretary, New Delhi
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
