Writ petition sought mandamus directing police to register a crime on the petitioner's complaint. Counsel submitted the cause did not survive for adjudication; the court dismissed the petition as infructuous, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :; AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3195 OF 2019
Between:
Kuruba Maggam Gurusiddappa, S/0. Late Maggam Nagappa, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Agriculture, Residing at Kanukur Village, Settur Mandal. Anantapuramu District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaringtheactionofthe 2"^ and 3'”'’ respondents in not taking action to registerthecrimebasedon the petitioner's complaint dated 19.01.2019 is legal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to register the crime on the petitioner's complaint dated19.01.2019. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 :
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be
pleased to direct the 2"^^ and 3'"^ respondents toregisterthecrimebasedon /'■ , ' V the petitioners complaint dated 19-01-2019 pendingdisposaloftheabove :n.4 writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SESHADRI GOALLA %■■■ Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 to 3 : SRI S SARATHKUMAR,
ASST. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010071002019
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3368]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 3195/2019
Between:
K M Gurusiddappa
...PETITIONER
AND
The State of AP and Others ...RESPONDENT{S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SESHADRI GOALLA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GPFOR HOME(AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India is filed for the following relief;
“....to issue an appropriate writ or order more particularly one in nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2”"' and 3'"^ respondentsin not taking action to register the crime based on the petitioners complaint dated 19.01.2019 is legal
2 arbitrary against the principles of natural Justiceand consequently direct the respondents to register the crime on the petitioners complaint dated 19.01.2019 and pass...”
- Recording the submission made by learned counsel forthe petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, the interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- P.U.V.BHASKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Nfy" SECTION OFFICER
skn
HIGH COURT DATED:20/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.3195 of 2019
2 6 MAR 2025 j ^ . Current Sectton
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kuruba Maggam Gurusiddappa
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
The District Superintendent of Police, Anantapuramu
The Station House Officer, Setturu Police Station
B V L N Chakravarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
