Dismissed

M/S. Sri Lakshmi Srinivasa Exports, Prakasam Dist v. Prl Secy, Industries & Commerce Dept., Hyd & 5 Ot

Andhra Pradesh HC3 Nov 2024WP/31520/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of a quarry lease application. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or be represented when summoned for arguments for the second time.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution without any costs or further relief to the petitioner.

M/S. Sri Lakshmi Srinivasa Exports, Prakasam… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND

¶4

TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 31520 OF 2016

¶8

Between:

¶9

M/S. Sri Lakshmi Srinivasa Exports, rep., by its Managing Partenr, Mukku Kasi Reddy, S/o. Dasi Reddy, Aged 59 Years, R/o.Sy.No.489(P), Veluguvaripalem Village, H/o Boddikurapadu Talluru Mandal, Prakasam District.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Principal Secretary to Government, Industries & Commerce (Mines-ll) Department,

¶13

Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶14

The Director of Mines and Geology Department 8th Floor, BRKR Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶15

The Assistant Director of Mines & Geology, Ongole, Prakasam District.

¶16

The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole.

¶17

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur, Prakasam District.

¶18

The Tahsildar, Tallur Mandal, Prakasam District.

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the proceedings in

¶21

D.Dis.Proceedings No.32947/R3-2/2011, dated 30.10.2015^{issuedbythe2nd} respondent where under rejected the application of^{thepetitionerforgrantof} quarry lease to an extent of 20 Hectors in Survey No.489 (Part) of Veluguvaripalem, H/o Boddikurapadu Village, Tallur Mandal, Prakasam District is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the^{rulesandconsequentlyset} aside the same and directed the 2"'^ respondent to issue the Mining lease in favour of the petitioner in pursuance of his Order^{dated19.05.2012andpass}

¶22

LA. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 38988 OF 2016)

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the impugned proceedings in D.Dis.Proceedings NO.32947/R3-2/2011, dated 30.10.2015 issued by the 2nd respondent by directing him to grant the lease infavour of the petitioner^{toanextentof20} Hectors in Survey No.489 (Part) of Veluguvaripalem, H/o Boddikurapadu Village, Tallur Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOTl REDDY IDAMAKANTI (Not Present)

¶25

Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR MINES^ANDGEOLOGY (AP)

¶26

Counsel for the Respondents No.4 to 6: GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

¶27

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶28

APHC010262212016

¶29

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3310] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶30

MONDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶31

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶32

WRIT PETITION NO: 31520/2016

¶33

Between:

¶34

M/s. Sri Lakshmi Srinivasa Exports, Prakasam Dist ...PETITIONER

¶35

AND

¶36

PrI Secy Industries Commerce Dept Hyd 5 Ot and Others

¶37

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶38

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶39

1.KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI

¶40

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶41

1.GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY (AP)

¶42

2.GPFOR REVENUE (AP)

¶43

The Court made the following:

¶44

ORDER:

¶45

None appeared for the petitioner. On the earlier occasion^also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. So, it appears

¶46

that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute^thematter.

¶47

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.

¶48

No order as to costs.

¶49

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall

¶50

stands closed.

¶51

Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to Sri Koti Reddy Idamakanti, Advocate [OPUC]

¶56

Two CCs to GP for Mines and Geology (AP), High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]

¶57

Two CCs to GP for Revenue (AP), High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]

¶58

Three CD Copies

¶59

JSS

¶60

WP-SS (gsg)

¶61

HIGH COURT DATED:04/11/2024

¶62

ORDER

¶63

WP.No.31520 of 2016

¶64

w
i/x 0 2 APR 2025
Current Section

¶65

DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.

M/S. Sri Lakshmi Srinivasa Exports, Prakasam Dist v. Prl Secy, Industries & Commerce Dept., Hyd & 5 Ot

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Sri Lakshmi Srinivasa Exports, Prakasam Dist v. Prl Secy, Industries & Commerce Dept., Hyd & 5 Ot

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kondapu Madhava Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Karri Lakshmi Naidu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Kalugula Sridevi Vs The Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum

S. Subba Raju, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Avva Ramana Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

M/s. Bellatrix Infrastructure Private Limited, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh