It is an order in a writ petition by an lecturer concerning his job. No advocate appeared on behalf of the petitioner on multiple dates, leading the court to dismiss the petition for default.
Petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
present
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NIO: 28265 OF 2015
Between:
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
f
respondent to continue the petitioner in service for the post of Lecturer Biology.
i^NO: 1 OF 2015 (WPMPjjaj66460F2i^
Petition under Section 151 QpQ praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court'may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in his duty as Lecturer Biology for one year as per the conditions in the appointment order by paying the revised pay of Rs.45,000/- pending deposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. R YOGENDER SINGH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010638362015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT aMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
WEDNESDAY .THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION MO: 28265/2015
Between:
Dr.p.raja Sekhar, West Godavari Dist
...PETITIONER
AND
Vice Chancellor Hyderabad 2 Others and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner;
1.RYOGENDER SINGH
Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.GP FOR EDUCATION
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
At the time when the matter was taken on 09.08.2024,therewasno representation on behalf of the petitioner and thematterwasposted to 14.08.2024. Even on 14.08.2024, when the matter wascalled,therewasno representation and the matter was posted to 21.08.2024,underthecaption “For Dismissal”.
Though the matter was listed today under the caption“ForDismissal”, none appeared for the petitioner. It appears that thepetitionerisnotevincing any interest in the present case.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for default.Nocosts.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any,shallstandclosed.
/ To
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- U.SRI DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
High Court Of Andhra Pradesh.
2 j^.CCs to GP FOR EDUCATION
MPK
f
HIGH COURT
DATED: 21/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.28265 of 2015
of
/>
//o
/X 0 5 FEB 2025
AO
. ^ Current Section
^ PAT C
DISMISSING WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.
Dr. P. Raja Sekhar
Vice Chancellor, Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies
V.Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
