Petitioner challenged a Labour Court award reinstating him without back wages after dismissal by a cooperative society for alleged financial irregularity. The court noted he had attained superannuation, so further orders on merits were unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT^^
(Special Original Jurisdiction) ^
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER^^^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR ^ ‘ \
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
vy
WRIT PETITION NO: 27952 OF 2011
Between:
T.Siva Shankar, S/o Sriramulu Reddy, aged 37 years, H.No.1-1161(A), V,.. jayaram Rao Street, Srikalahasti - 515 644, Chittoor District.
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorary quash the award passed by the 1st respondent in ID No.292of 2005,dated18-02-2011, and published on 30-4^011 in so far as not granting the full back wages as illegal, unjust contrary to law and grant the consequential benefits.
r
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 34473 OF 2011)
A
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR LABOUR
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI R CHANDRA REDDY
The Court made the following order:
■ ^
APHC010060432011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3457]
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 27952/2011
Between:
T.siva Shankar,chittoor Dist
...PETITIONER
AND
Chairman And Presiding Officer ItcumIc Ananthapur Another and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR LABOUR
2.R CHANDRA REDDY
The Court made the following:
2
Order:-
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
- No counter is filed by the respondents.
3
not conducted. Considering all that, the Labour Courthassetasidetheorder of dismissal and directed reinstatement.
- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has also attained the age of superannuation.
- Considering submission that the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation, further orders on merits would not be necessary.
- Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. Thereshallbenoorder as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shallstandclosed.
/ / !/
SDI- M.PRABHAKARA RAO //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
To,
GSC
HIGH COURT DATED:19/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.27952 of 2011
I' 2 0 DEC 202'f J
^ ^ Curreni oeciion
CLOSING OF THE WP
WITHOUT COSTS
3 provisions across 3 enactments
T. Siva Shankar
The Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Ananthapur
The Chair Person, Srikalahasti Cooperative Milk Supply Society Ltd., Srikalahasti
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
