Writ petition listed for dismissal; no representation for the petitioner on the day or earlier. The court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution, with no order as to costs, and closed pending miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3457]
APHC010017042011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 23616/2011
Between:
Srm M.appalakonda, Visakhapatnam
...PETITIONER
AND
Chairman United India Insurance Co Ltd Chennai 2 Others and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.GODA RAMALAKSHMI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.K SRINIVASA MURTHY
The Court made the following:
2
Order:-
Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there is no representation for the petitioner.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________
JUSTICE HARINATH.N
19.11.2024 PNS
Srm M.appalakonda, Visakhapatnam
Chairman United India Insurance Co Ltd Chennai 2 Others and Others
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
