Writ petition closed by consent as no issue survives for adjudication. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR j
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 27716 OF 2015
Between:
Smt.Gandikota Naaga,, W/o China Venkata Rao, Hindu aged about 29 yrs, Occ;House Wife, Rio Near Ramalayam, Phirangula Dibba 24th Ward, Eluru, West Godavari District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
circumstancesPetition statedunder inArticlethe affidavit226 offiledthetherewith,Constitutionthe Highof IndiaCourtpraying may Lthatpleasedin theto
issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 5 to 7 in detaining the petitioner's husband and her mother-in-law and sister-in-law from morning to evening in the 4th respondent police station without there being any cause or case against them and insisting them to ■vacate the premises bearing plot No.107 in Sy.Nos.78, 79, of Phirangula Dibba, Near Ramalayam, 24th ward, Eluru, West Godavari District at the instance of the 8th respondent during pendency of the civil case in P.L.C.No.611 of 2015 on the file of the District Legal Services Authority, Eluru, West Godavari District, filed by the 8th respondent, and demanding money and forced to settle the case with the 8th respondent, or else threatening with dire consequences of implicating them in false cases as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violationofArticle 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents 5 to 7 not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner, petitioner's husbandandmother-in-lawandsister-in- law by summoning them to the 4th respondent police station, under the threat of implicating them in false cases, without there being any cause against them and to pass such other order or orders as the Honourable Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 35983 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 5 to 7 not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner and her family members by summoning them to the 4th respondent police station without there being any cause, and to pass such other orderor orders asthis Hon'blecourt may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of thecase.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. G L NAGESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 7; GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
N
APHC010I4S8520IS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 27716 OF 2015
Between:
Smt.Gandikota Naaga, ...PETITIONER(S)
AND
THE STATE OF A P AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. G L NAGESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Yeshwanth, learned counsel, representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in the present Writ Petition for further adjudication and the same can be closed. Recording the said submission, the present Writ Petitionisclosed.There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
SD/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION O FFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:20/02/2024
ORDER
WP.No.27716 of 2015
0?ANDH/^
m
X 3 I AUj 2:?'! C9,
O Jh
^ Current Section ^ ^
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt.Gandikota Naaga
The State of A.P.
The Superintendent of Police, Eluru
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Eluru
The Station House Officer, III Town Law & Order P.S., Eluru
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
