Writ petition challenging refusal to renew a lease of choultry premises and a direction to vacate was not decided on merits; counsel sought leave to withdraw and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 27347 OF 2016
Between:
B.Nagi Reddy, Son of Chenchi Reddy, Aged about 35 years, Railpet, Resident of Guntur, Guntur District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction, more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent vide Proceedings D.Dis.No.D3/20597/2015 dated 04.04.2016 refusing to renew the license of the petitioner and the proceedings of the 3^'^ respondent vide Letter No.Nil/2016 dated 02.05.2016 directing the petitioner to vacate the premises is highly unjust, arbitrary, discriminatory, violative of principles of natural justice, contrary to Memo No.20175/Endt.l(2)/2010-11 dated 18.05.2010 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue
(Endowments) Department, illegal and unsustainable and consequentially direct the respondents 2 and 3 to renew the lease ofthepetitioneronparwith other tenants.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 33878 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to evict thepetitionerfromthebuilding consisting of 14 rooms in TS No.153 of Guntur Town, belonging to Sri Padarthi Venkanna Choultry, Railpet, Guntur, GunturDistrict, in respect of which the petitioner was having lease pending disposal of the above Writ Petition
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim order dated 12.08.2016 passed in WPNo.27347of 2016 until further orders.
lA NO: 2 OF 2018
Between:
The Executive Officer, Sri Padarthi Venkanna Choultiy, Railpet, Guntur, Guntur District.
...VAATE PETITIONER/R3
AND
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to vacate the interim order passed in WP No. 27347 /2016 dt. 12.08.2106.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C. RAMACHANDRA RAJU
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SR! K. MADHAVA REDDY, SC FOR ENDOWENTS
The Court made the following: ORDER
o
APHC010303242016
f V f
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3233]
MONDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 27347/2016
Between:
B.Nagi Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
State Of Ap Scy Endowments Hyd 2 and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.C RAMACHANDRA RAJU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP)
2
The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permissionofthis Court to withdraw the writ petition, for which he submittedaletter dated 14.03.2024 to the Registrar (Judicial).
- Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. Nocosts.
2
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,shallstand
closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY// SD/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT registrar .1^ SECTION OFFICER
Cnr
HIGH COURT
DATED: 18/03/2024
ORDER
WP.No.27347 of 2016
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
B. Nagi Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Secretary, Endowments Department
The Commissioner, Endowments Department, State of Andhra Pradesh
The Executive Officer, Sri Padarthi Venkanna Choultry, Railpet, Guntur
B. Krishna Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
