In this writ petition regarding service regularization, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn by the petitioner.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition and proceedings were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV (Special Original Jurisdiction) y
THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA^ WRIT PETITION NO: 27341 OF 2021
Between:
Contingent Employee (Sweeper) O/o. the Spl.Dy. Collector (LA) APlIC.Visakhapatnam.
...PETITIONER
AND
(APIIC), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh.
4. The Spl. Dy. Collector (LA), APIIC, Visakhapatnam.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one inthe nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents not to regularizing the petitioner's service though he has been continuously working as full time contingent employee as sweeper in the Spl. Dy. Collector (LA) office, APPIC, Visakhapatnam since 01.11.1993, i is illegal, irregular. Arbitrary, Violation of Principle of natural justice and offends under Article 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution Of India and consequently to
direct the respondents to regularize my service with all consequently benefits.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularization his service pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SIMHACHALAM KARUKOLA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 4 : SRI J. UGRANARASIMHA, SC FOR APIIC
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010453832021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
[3329]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 27341/2021
Between:
Karri Ramana
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
The Court made the following Order: Sri Karukola Simhachalam, learned counsel for the petitionerseeks
permission of this Court to withdraw the present WritPetition.
- Permission as sought for is accorded.
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn,giving
liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition.Nocosts.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
SD/- S.SRINIVASA PRASAD ASSISTANT/REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To
SECTION OFFICER
- One CC to Sri Simhachalam Karukola, Advocate [OPUC]
- Two CCs to GP for Services I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
- One CC to Sri J. Ugranarasimha, SC for APIIC (OPUC)
- Three C.D. Copies. Cnr
A
HIGH COURT
DATED;18/04/2024
ORDER
WP.No.27341 of 2021
O
o
^7 7> o\
1 (I MAr miS
Kurco™!
Sk
/
A/l
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a petition for regularization of service may continue pending the disposal of the writ.
Whether the writ petition for regularization of service may be withdrawn on an application by the petitioner.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Karri Ramana
State of Andhra Pradesh
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
