The High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as infructuous, holding that a permanent dealer notification had been cancelled prior to the present petition.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR " ^
PRESENT
A.
.?rrs
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 27252 OF 2015 ,
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
" 6. The Tahsildar, Kodumur Mandal, Kurnool District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari after calling for the records relating to orders passed by the 3rd respondent in Revision Case No. CS. 3/33/2013 Dt. 2704-2015 against the order of 4th respondent in proceeding No. CS 3/237/2011 Dt.21-8-2012 in confirming the orders of the 5th respondent in Rc.B No.1398/2011 Dt.30-11-2011 and quash the same.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 35362 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to make any permanent arrangement for running of fair price shop No.13 at Kodumuru Village, Kodumuru Mandal Kurnool District pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI L V S NAGARAJU
Counsel for the Respondents Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP)
Counsel for the Respondents Nos. 3 & 6: GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following: ORDER
r
APHC010041432015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at AMARAVATl [3329] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 27252/2015
Between;
...PETITIONER B Latha, W/o Late Sudhakar
AND
V V
...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner;
1.LVS NAGARAJU
Counsel for the Respondent(S);
1.15548/GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2.GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following;
ORDER;
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed from the docket representation on behalf sheet that on 27.03.2024 and 01.04.2024, there isno posted under the caption 'For Dismissal'. On of the petitioner and the matter is the petitioner sought time for getting 18.04.2024, learned counsel for in the present Writ Petition survives or not. But instructions whether the cause today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
that the authorization of the Learned Government Pleader submits 2011. Thereafter, notification was already cancelled in the year petitioner was 07.01.2015. Hence, no cause issued for appointment of permanent dealer on present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ survives for further adjudication in the Petition becomes infructuous.
Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
pending shall stand closed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any
SDI- K KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
CHSL
DATED:25/04/2024
ORDER
WP.No.27252 of 2015
7X 2 5 NOV 202'! If
^ . Current Section
^S£fS»*ATCV^
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
B Latha, W/o Late Sudhakar
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Director of Civil Supplies, A.P
District Collector, Kurnool
Joint Collector, Kurnool
Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
