A 2008 writ petition challenging an attachment notice under the Revenue Recovery Act over agricultural land was dismissed in January 2024 for want of prosecution, with no representation for the petitioner. Miscellaneous petitions pending were ordered closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 271 OF 2008
Between:
Karri Gangi Reddy S/o Veereddy, aged 60 years, Agriculturer/oArthamuru Village, Mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ,orderordirection more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3'^'^ respondent issuing the impugned notice of attachmentin Form-5 dated 1912-2007 under Revenue Recovery Act proposing to attach the petitioner's Agricultural land in survey no 5/39 of Arthamuru Village, mandapeta Mandal, east Godavari District as being illegal, arbitraryand violative of principles of natural justice and fair play and consequentlysetasidethe
STi
impugned attachment notice in Form-5 dated 19-12-2007 under Revenue Recovery Act proposing to attach the petitioners agricultural lands in Survey No. 5/39 of Arthamuru Village, Mandapeta Mandal,EastGodavari District.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2008tWPMP. NO: 282 OF 20081
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings initiated by the 3 rd respondent consequent to the issuance of the impugned notice in Form-5, dated 19-12.2007 under Revenue Recovery Act proposing to attach the petitioners agricultural land in Survey No. 5/39 of Arthamuru Village mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. D. V. CHALAPATHI RAO
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX The Court made the following: ORDER
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH NUNEPALLY
WRIT PETITION No.271 OF 2008
JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
No representation for the petitioner.
- The matter pertains to the year 2008 and is listedin
the Weekly Cause List.
- The Writ Petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending.
shall also stand closed.
SD/- B CHITTI JOSEPH
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Nm
sree
t
It*
HIGH COURT DATED:12/01/2024
ORDER
WP.No,271 of 2008
DISMISSING THE WP FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Karri Gangi Reddy
The Commissioner Commercial Taxes Department
The Deputy Commissioner Commercial Taxes Department, Kakinada Division
The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Mandapeta Circle
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Harinath N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
