Income tax tribunal appeal listed in weekly cause list; no representation appeared for the appellant, so the High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution with no order as to costs and closed pending miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
FRIDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 39 OF 2009
Appeal under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam dated 20/06/2008 passed in I.T.A.No.126/Vizag/2002 for the assessment year 1998-99 preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guntur dated 24/12/2001 passed in ITA No.10/BPT/CIT(A)/G/2001-02fortheassessment year 1998-99 preferred against the order of the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatia, Guntur District passed in PAN/GIR No.V-375, dated 29/03/2001fortheassessment year 1998-99.
Between:
M/S Sri Venkateswara Traders, Machavaram., Machavaram, Guntur District. Andhra Pradesh. Income Tax officer, Ward-2, Bapatia., ward-2, Bapatia, Guntur district.
AND
...Appellant/Appellant
...Respondent/Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant(s): SRI. A V RAGHU RAM (NOT APPEARED)
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B NARASIMHA SARMA
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH NUNEPALLY
LNCOME tax tribunal appeal No.39 of 2000
JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ram Nath Tilhari)
No representation for the appellant.
- The matter pertains to the year 2009 and is listed in
the Weekly Cause List.
- The Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed for
want of prosecution.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,
shall also stand closed.
Sd/- P. VENKATA RAMANA JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFICER
- The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, VIsakhapatnam.
- The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guntur, Guntur District.
- The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatia, Guntur District.
- One CC to Sri A.V.Raghu Ram, Advocate [OPUC]
- One CC to Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, Advocate.[OPUC].
- Three CD Copies.
MSR
AL
HIGH COURT :v
«> t' \ s < DATED:12/01/2024
ORDER
ITTA.No.39 of 2009
DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
eg fojpi'w i^\j /th is-y
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Sri Venkateswara Traders, Machavaram, Guntur District
Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bapatia, Guntur District
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Harinath N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
