Tikkana Veera Venkata Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging recognition of a private school was withdrawn by the petitioner and dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Writ petition challenging recognition of a private school was withdrawn by the petitioner and dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 25898 OF 2nifi
Between:
CorrespondentTikkana Veeraof VenkataGodavari Rao,Vidya S/oPeethamMuneyya," Aged^ 54 years, Hindu, R/o D.No. 4-146, Divancheruvu, Rajanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District.
...PETITIONER
AND
Godavari District.
epartment, 9th Floor, B.R.K. Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad
CormsDoSp Represented by its E r? -T ^ Rrasad S/o Hare Rama Krishna, Aged about 35
=.sss,“-sr
...RESPONDENTS
circun,s?a™°e"s Sfd" 06 06%016 S°rn,' iS s'74"?r2Vi5''r 14,12.2015 as arbifrary, autocratic, ultravires and against to the princlTes
natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 6 herein to close the 8th re^ondent school as it is running against to the rules and guidelines issued under GO Ms 1 Education Department dt. 1.1.1994 in the interests of justice.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2016rWPMP. NO: 32013 OF ?niR)
th^ .ffS n *hat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to sSoeTd'thr r Direction directing the respondents 3and4hereinto suspend the recognition issued to the 8th respondent school under proceedinos the hie of th?T°Kf disposal of the main Writ PeXZ the file of this Hon ble Court in the interests of justice.
Counsel for the PetitionerSRI. CHANDRA SEKHAR ILAPAKURTI
Counsel for the Respondents No.1,2,4,5,6,7: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.8: SRI. D. LINGA RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.25898 of 2016
ORDER
When the matter is taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. To that effect, he has also filed a letter dated 09.01.2024.
- Permission is accorded.
- Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
SDI- U. SRIDEVI
//TRUE COPY//
ASSISTANT ^GISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,
I
HIGH COURT
DATED; 11/01/2024
ORDER
WP.No.25898 of 2016
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
0
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tikkana Veera Venkata Godavari Rao (Correspondent, Vidya Peetham)
The Commissioner & Director, School Education, State of Andhra Pradesh
The District Collector, East Godavari District
The District Educational Officer, East Godavari District
The Deputy Educational Officer, Rajahmundry Division
The Mandal Educational Officer, Rajanagaram Mandal
V.Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court