Writ petition challenging interference by the temple's Executive Officer in management of the petitioner association's choultry was dismissed for default for want of representation; any interim order stood vacated and miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 25684 OF 2011
Between:
The Arya, Gowda, Ediga Association, Plot No.8, Near Srisailam Devastanam, Srisailam, Kurnool District, Registration No. 114/1980, rep. by its General Secretary, P. Raghuveer Das.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the first
Respondent i.e., the Executive Officer of Sri Bhramaramba Mallikharjuna Devasthanam, Srisailam, Kurnool District in interfering with the management of the petitioner's Association in the choultry and in trying to include the 3rd respondent samithi in the activities of Koundinya (Gouda) Satram contrary to the agreement entered on 10.05.1982 between petitioner and 1st respondent as bad, illegal, arbitrary, opposed to law, one .without jurisdiction.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 31661 OF 2011)
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent i.e., the Executive Officer of Sri Bhramaramba Mallikharjuna Devasthanam Srisailam, Kurnool District, not to interfere with the activities of petitioner's association in managing the Koundinya (Gowda) Satram at Srisailam by illegally permitting the 3rd respondent to involve in the day-to-day activities of satram, pending disposal of the writ petition.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WVMP. NO: 3930 OF 2011)
Between:
Sri Bhramaramba Mallikharjuna Devasathanam, Srisailam, Kurnool District, rep. by its Executive Officer.
...Petitioner/1®* Respondent
AND
...Respondent/Petitioner
... Respondents/Respondents
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim order passed in WPMP No. 31661 of 2011, dated 14-09-2011 in WP No. 25684 of 2011
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. M VIDYASAGAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI G RAMANA RAO (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS RAYALASEEMA REGION)
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI J JANAKIRAMI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following; ORDER
s!
APHC010083822011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3233]
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
Between:
Secy., Arya, Gowda, Ediga Assn., Kurnool Dist. ...PETITIONER , AND
E 0 Sri Bhramaramba Mallikharjuna Devasthanam 2 Ors ...RESPONDENT(S) and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.M VIDYASAGAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
2.9096/J JANAKIRAMI REDDY
3.16032/A SREEKANTH REDDY(SC FOR ENDOW RS)
4.G RAMANA RAO (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS RAYALASEEMAREGION)
The Court made the following Order:
No representation for the petitioner, in spite of posting the
matter under the caption “for dismissal”.
representation for the petitioner.
2
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,shallstand closed.
Sd /- B. CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
5. Three CD Copies
Madhu
•>
HIGH COURT
DATED:22/03/2024
ORDER
WP.No.25684of 2011
X 0 3 FEB M25 Co
O
Current Section
^^6spatC'^*!3^^
DISMISSING THE WP FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
The Arya, Gowda, Ediga Association, Srisailam, rep. by its General Secretary P. Raghuveer Das
Sri Bhramaramba Mallikharjuna Devasathanam, Srisailam, rep. by its Executive Officer
The Commissioner of Endowments
Arya, Gowda, Ediga (Koundinya) Nitya Annadana Seva Samithi, Srisailam, rep. by its President
B Krishna Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
