Allowed

Bandaru Venugopala Rao v. Alluri Anasuya

Andhra Pradesh HC21 Mar 2024CRP/348/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Amravati allowed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Sections 115 and 151 of the CPC to set aside a docket order. The Court quashed the impugned order and granted liberty for the decree holder to file a fresh execution application only after 03.04.2024, effectively continuing the previous interim order's stay.

What did the court decide?

The docket order dated 14.02.2024 is set aside. Liberty granted to file a fresh execution application only after 03.04.2024, subject to the interim order limits. Petition disposed. No order as to cost

Bandaru Venugopala Rao Vs Alluri Anasuya — Execution and Attachment | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 348 OF 2024

¶7

Petition under Section 115 of CPC., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to set aside the docket order dated 14.02.2024 in E.A.No.35/2024 m E.P.No.7/2022 in O.S.No.80/1999 passed by the III Addl. District Judge. Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.

¶8

Between;

¶9

Bandaru Venugopala Rao, S/o.Mahankali, Aged about 68 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o.Kalla Village and Mandal, West Godavari District.

¶10

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/JDR

¶11

AND

¶12

Alluri Anasuya, W/o.Late Rajeev Raju, Aged about 65 years, Occ Housewife, R/o.Flat No. 1, Sri Sai Ram Apartment, Near RTO Office

¶13

Pedamiram, Kalla Mandal, West Godavari District

¶14

Rudraraju Swathi, W/o.Ashok Srinivasa Raju, D/o.Late Rajeev Raju,

¶15

Aged about 43 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o.Flat No.303 Apurupa

¶16

Apartments, Zublie Garden behind Harsha Toyota Showroom,

¶17

Kondapur, Serlingampalli, Hyderabad.

¶18

Alluri Jyothi, W/o.Srinivasa Varma f Kalidinidi, D/o.Late Rajeev Raju,

¶19

aged about 41 years, Occ. House wife,R/o.2802 ^ Del Hollow Dr.Round

¶20

Rock, Texas-78665, USA. Permanent R/o.Plot No.32,33, Flat No.303, Apurupa Apartments, Zublie Garden behind Harsha Toyota Showroom, Kondapur, Serlingampalli, Hyderabad.

¶21

...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶22

lA NO: 2 OF 2n?d

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitioh, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the docket order dated 14.02.2024 in E.A.No.35/2024 in E.P.No.7/2022 in O.S.No.80/1999 passed by the Hon'ble III Addl. District Judge, Bhimavaram , West Godavari District.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. B V ANJANEYULU

¶25

Counsel for the Respondents No.s 1 & 2: SRI N ASHWANI KUMAR

¶26

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶27

APHC010083282024

¶28

[3233]

¶29

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶30

FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶31

PRESENT

¶32

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN

¶33

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO;

¶34

Between:

¶35

Bandaru Venugopala Rao ...PETITIONER

¶36

AND

¶37

Alluri Anasuya and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

¶38

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶39

1.B VANJANEYULU

¶40

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶41

N ASHWANI KUMAR

¶42

2.N ASHWANI KUMAR

¶43

N ASHWANI KUMAR

¶44

The Court made the following Order:

¶45

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶46

This Civil Revision Petition is filed to set aside the docket order dated 14.02.2024 in E.A.No.35/2024 in E.P.No.7/22 in O.S.No.80/ 1999 on the file of the HonTile 111 Additional District Judge,

¶47

¶48

Bhimavaram, West Godavari District by allowing the Civil Revision Petition.

¶49

This Court passed the interim order dated 23.02.2024, continues up to 03.04.2024 only.

¶50

Accordingly, the order under Revision dated 14.02.2024 is set-aside by giving liberty for the Decree Holder to file a fresh application in execution of the proceedings after 03.04.2024 pursuant to the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No. 114 of 2010 dated^03.01.2024.

¶51

Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed^of. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall^benoorderas to costs.

¶52

As a sequel. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,^shallstand closed.

¶53

SD/- P VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The III Addl. District Judge, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.(with records if any)

¶58

One CC to Sri. B V Anjaneyulu, Advocate [OPUC]

¶59

One CC to Sri. N Ashwani Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]

¶60

The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of^{AndhraPradesh.}

¶61

Three CD Copies

SKM

vna

HIGH COURT

DATED:22/03/2024

ORDER

CRP.No.348 of 2024

;3f'
v.>
av
m
21 JUN 202^
•Zy/
Cuirerii ber.tion ^
O/f PATCVk^^S^^

¶69

disposing of the C.R.P., WITHOUT COSTS

Bandaru Venugopala Rao v. Alluri Anasuya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bandaru Venugopala Rao v. Alluri Anasuya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/ s Eureka Granites Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

M/s Eureka Granites Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

C Ramachandraiah Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

M/s. Standard Infratech India Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Secy., Arya, Gowda, Ediga Assn., Kurnool Dist. Vs E.O., Sri Bhramaramba Mallikharjuna Devasthanam and 2 Ors.

I.V. Ramanamurthy, Vizianagara Dist. Vs the Commissioner, Endowments Dept., Hyd and 2 Othrs