A writ petition seeking police protection for the petitioner and her two minor daughters was dismissed after counsel stated the cause no longer survived and had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THH HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANIMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 2442 OF 201
Between:
Smt. G. Chowdeswari, Anantapur District. Occupation; Business, R/o. 24-2-32, Opposite to Rice Mill Mothukupalli, Hindupur, Anantapuram District.
...PETITIONER
AND
Department, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
Anantapuram District.
Anantapuram District.
Opposite to Rice Mill, Mothukupalli, Hindupur Anantapuram District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus,declaringtheactionof the respondents 2 to 4 herein in not providing any protection to the >oeti?toner as well to her two minor daughters from the high handed and ’‘•i^al acts of the respondent No. 5 herein even inspiteofactinguponthe complaint lodged on 30.1.2015 and initiating any actioninpursuancetothe same against the 5th respondent and his allies, asbeing illegal, arbitrary and is in volation of principles of natural justice and fair play apart from established precedencts as well in violation of Articles 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to take appropriate action as well to give protection to thepetitioner.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 3268 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 4 herein to give protection to the petitioner and her minor daughters from the 5th respondentand his allies forthwith and report compliance to this Honourable Court, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. M CHALAPATHI
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
[ 3310 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
♦•'V-s
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 2442 OF 2015
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
1
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 herein in not providing any protectionto the petitioner as well to her two minor daughters fromthe high handed and illegal acts of the respondent No. 5 herein even inspite of acting upon the complaint lodged on
/
2
same30.1.2015againstandtheinitiating5th respondentany actionandin hispursuanceallies as tobeingthe ustice and f volation of principles of natural justice and fair play apart from established precedencts~utSn a^Of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to petmo^nTr'"^"^'^ Protection to the
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. M CHALAPATHI
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
Both the learned counsel are present.
- Mr.Jampani Paul Prasad, learned counsel representing Mr.M.Chalapathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous and hence, prayed to dismiss the writ petition.
- Recording the said submission, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.
To,
SD/- U. SRIDEVI //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
high court
DATED;13/02/2024
ORDER
V/P.No.2442 of 2015
dismissing the w.p AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
20
■'''S', c-rni.
V;.
Smt. G. Chowdeswari
The State of A.P., Home
The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Penukonda Sub Division
The Sub Inspector of Police, I Town Police Station, Hindupur
Mr. Jayarami Reddy
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
