Allowed

Jasti Venkateswara Rao v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its

Andhra Pradesh HC29 Jul 2024WP/24237/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged the Government's direction to deduct 1% Labour Cess from payments made to contractors on works where the original agreements did not include the cess amount. The Single Judge had previously held that deductions cannot be made if the cess is not included in the estimates.

What did the court decide?

Allowing the writ petition, the Court directed that the 1% Labour Cess must be included in the estimates for relevant works; consequently, respondents shall not deduct any amount towards cess unless s

Jasti Venkateswara Rao Vs The Government of… — Service and Employment | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 24237 OF 2010

¶6

Between:

¶7

Jasti Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Anjaneyulu Special Class^{ContractorD.No.14} 1-40, Anjaneyapuram, Cheepurupalli Mandal.

¶8

...Petitioner

¶9

AND

¶10

of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its. Principal Secretary,

¶11

1 The Government Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

The Deputy Hyderabad.

¶13

Financial Advisor and E O.D.S. to Government, Secretariat,

¶14

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its. Principal^Secretary, Transport, Roads and Buildings Department, Secretariat,^Hyderabad,

¶15

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶16

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal^Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶17

The Director of Works Accounts, Pay & Accounts Office Near Exhibition Grounds, Hyderabad.

¶18

The Engineer in Chief, (P.R.) PMGSY., Erramanzil,^Hyderabad.

¶19

The Chief Engineer, (P.R.) N.A.B.A.R.D Erramanzil,^Hyderabad.

¶20

The Engineer - in - Chief, (P.R.) Administration^{Erramanzil,Hyderabad.}

¶21

¶22

¶23

The Engineer - in - Chief, (R & B) PMGSY., Administration^& N.H., Erramanzil, Hyderabad. * (S11-. The Engineer - in - Chief, (R & B) Roads, Erramanzil, Hyderabad. ♦ \ r- i .4 12j*^Tlid Managing Director, (R & B) APRDC., Masab^{Tank,Hyderabad.} m. '* 13.".THe Chief Engineer, (R &B) NABARD, Hyderabad.

¶24

The Engineer - in - Chief, APIIC. Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶25

The Superintending Engineer, P.R. Srikakulam, Shkakulam^District.

¶26

The Superintending Engineer, P.R. Guntur, Guntur^District.

¶27

The Superintending Engineer, P.R. Ongole, Prakasam^District.

¶28

The Superintending Engineer, R & B Guntur, Guntur^District.

¶29

The Superintending Engineer, R & B Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶30

The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Visakhapatnam, VisakhapatnamDistrict.

¶31

The Superintending Engineer, R & B N.H., Vijayawada,^{KrishnaDistrict.}

¶32

The Superintending Engineer, Agricultural Marketing Hyderabad.

¶33

The Commissioner, The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶34

The Executive Engineer, (P.R.) Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶35

The Executive Engineer, R & B Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶36

The Zonal Manager, Special Project Zone Industrial Estate, Visakhapatnam.

¶37

The Executive Engineer, (P.R.) Srikakulam, Srikakulam^District.

¶38

The Executive Engineer, (P.R.) Palakonda, Srikakulam^District.

¶39

The Zonal Manager, APIIC. Industrial Estate, Visakhapatnam.

¶40

The Chief Engineer, Visakhapatnam Port Trust Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶41

¶42

The Executive Engineer, (P.R.) Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram^District. 32. The Superintending Engineer, R & B Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District.

¶43

The Superintending Engineer, R & B Srikakulam,^{SrikakulamDistrict.}

¶44

The Executive Engineer, R & B Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram^District.

¶45

The Executive Engineer, R & B Srikakulam, Srikakulam^District.

¶46

The Executive Engineer, R & B Tekali, Srikakulam^District.

¶47

The Executive Engineer, R & B Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram^District.

¶48

The Executive Engineer, P.R. Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram^District.

¶49

The Executive Engineer, P.R. Eluru, West Godavari^District.

¶50

The Executive Engineer, P.R. Jangareddygudem, West Godavari District.

¶51

...Respondents

¶52

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the^actionofthe respondents in not including the 1% towards Labour Cess in respect of the various works allotted to the petitioner and payments^{madeafter26-06-} 2007 by revising the estimates as per U.O. Note No. 4763/PES. F8/(A1)/08-4, dated 28-02-2008 as illegal, arbitrary^and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to include^the 1%^LabourCessin the various works entrusted to the petitioner for all the payments made after 26-06-2007 as per U.O. Note dated 28-02-2008^{andalsoreleasethe} amounts which were already recovered in this regard to the petitioner.

¶53

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 23790 OF 2011)

¶54

Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to delete the name of 20*^ Respondent from the list of the Respondents.

¶55

/ ’

¶56

¶57

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 31012 OF 2010)

¶58

Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to^{include1%amount} towards Labour Cess in terms of U.O. Note No. 4763/PES. F8/(A1 )/08-4, dated 28-02-2008 by revising the estimates for all the payment made from 26-06-2007 onwards relating to the various works undertaken by the petitioner and also direct the respondents shall not deduct any amount towards cess unless the corresponding amount is included in the estimation, pending disposal of the Writ petition.

¶59

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. RAMA RAO GHANTA

¶60

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3,10 to 13,18,19, 21,^25,26, and 32 to 37: GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

¶61

Counsel for the Respondent No.23: S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY (SC FOR GVMC)

¶62

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR IRRIGATION^COMMAREA DEV

¶63

Counsel for the Respondent No.24 &31: P SRI RAGHU RAM

¶64

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5, 7 to 9,15 to 17,^27,28,31 AND^38to 40: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV

¶65

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 &6: GP FOR FINANCE^& PLANNING

¶66

Counsel for the Respondent No 20: GP FOR MED HEALTH^ANDFAMILY WELFARE

¶67

Counsel for the Respondent No.22: GP FOR AGRICULTURE

¶68

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 14 &29: SRI. P ROY^REDDY

¶69

The Court made the following: ORDER

/ "

f •

APHC010247092010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶76

[3328]

¶77

TUESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶78

PRESENT

¶79

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶80

WRIT PETITION NO: 24237/2010

¶81

Between:

¶82

1.JASTI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/0. ANJANEYULU SPECIAL CLASS CONTRACTOR D.NO. 14-1-40 ANJANEYAPURAM, CHEEPURUPALLI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

¶83

...PETITIONER{S)

¶84

AND

¶85

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.

¶86

THE DEPUTY FINANCIAL ADVISOR AND E O D S TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.

¶87

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.

¶88

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.

¶89

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.

¶90

THE DIRECTOR OF WORKS ACCOUNTS, PAY & ACCOUNTS

¶91

■TO* w

¶92

¶93

OFFICE NEAR EXHIBITION GROUNDS, HYDERABAD.

¶94

THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, (P.R.) PMGSY., ERRAMANZIL HYDERABAD.

¶95

THE CHIEF ENGINEER, (P.R.) N.A.B.A.R.D ERRAMANZIL HYDERABAD.

¶96

THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, (P.R.) ADMINISTRATION ERRAMANZIL, HYDERABAD.

¶97

10.THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, (R & B) PMGSY. ADMINISTRATION & N.H., ERRAMANZIL, HYDERABAD.

¶98

11.THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, (R & B) ROADS, ERRAMANZIL HYDERABAD.

¶99

12.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, (R & B) APRDC., MASAB TANK HYDERABAD.

¶100

13.THE CHIEF ENGINEER, (R &B) NABARD, HYDERABAD.'

¶101

14.THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, APIIC. BASHEERBAGH HYDERABAD.

¶102

15.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, P.R. SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶103

16.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, P.R. GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶104

17.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, P.R. ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

¶105

18.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R & B GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶106

19.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R & B VISAKHAPATNAM. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶107

20.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶108

21.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R & B N.H. VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

7 ’■

.f'

22.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, AGRICULTURAL MARKETING HYDERABAD.

¶113

23.THE COMMISSIONER, THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶114

24.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (P.R.) VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶115

25.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R & B VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶116

26.THE ZONAL MANAGER, SPECIAL PROJECT ZONE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, VISAKHAPATNAM.

¶117

27.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (P.R.) SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶118

28.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (P.R.) PALAKONDA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶119

29.THE ZONAL MANAGER, APIIC. INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, VISAKHAPATNAM.

¶120

30.THE CHIEF ENGINEER, VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶121

31.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (P.R.) VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

¶122

32.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R & B VIZIANAGARAM VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

¶123

33.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R & B SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶124

34.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R & B VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

¶125

35.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R & B SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶126

36.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R & B TEKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶127

¶128

37.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R & B PARVATHIPURAM VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

¶129

38.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.R. PARVATHIPURAM VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.

¶130

39.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.R. ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶131

40.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.R. JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

¶132

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶133

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶134

1.RAMA RAOGHANTA

¶135

Counsel for the Respondent{S):

¶136

GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

¶137

S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY(SC FOR GVMC)

¶138

VCHNAIDU

¶139

GP FOR MUNCIPALADMN URBAN DEV

¶140

GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV

¶141

GP FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

¶142

GP FOR AGRICULTURE

¶143

P ROY REDDY 9. J UGRANARASIMHA (SC FOR APIIC) 10.GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV

¶144

11.P SRI RAGHU RAM

¶145

12.M VIDYASAGAR

¶146

13.GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING

¶147

¶148

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶149

Heard Ms. Mahathi Saaveri, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri K. Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning.

¶150

Prayer made in the Writ Petition is as under;-

¶151

“ issue a writ, order or direction more particularly^{oneinthenatureofWRIT} OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not including the 1% towards Labour Cess in respect of the various works allotted to the petitioner and payments made after 26.06.2007 by revising^theestimates as per U.O. Note No.4763/PES.F8/(A1)/08-4 dated 28.02.2008 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents^toincludethe 1% Labour Cess in the various works entrusted to the petitioner for all the payments made after 26.06.2007 as per U.O. Note dated 28.02.2008 and also release the amounts which were already recovered in this regard to the petitioner and pass...”

¶152

The Writ Petitioner is a registered contractor carrying out Infrastructure Projects and construction works in various Government Departments. The Writ Petitioner is presently doing^{workswhichareunder} the control of the Government of Andhra Pradesh (Respondent No.3) with regard to improvements to Elwinpeta - Ramannaguda Road to Eguvu Tadikonda from k.3/0 to 6/180 in Vizianagaram District. The Government of Andhra Pradesh has issued Memo dated 28.02.2008 bearing U.O.Note N0.4763/PFS. F8 (A1)08-4 (Ex.P.3), (Impugned Memo). Vide the Impugned Memo dated 28.02.2008, the following demands are made :

¶153

I. In respect of ongoing works, wherever agreements do not contain the clause relating to the condition of the Building and other construction Workers Cess Act, an amount of @ 1% of^the amount will be added to the estimates and the estimates revised accordingly for all pay.ments made afte-’r 26.06.2007.

¶154

f agreements which provide that the Contractor shall

¶155

... of Construction Workers Cess Act, 1996

¶156

e contractor has no option but to

¶157

at source effect from 26.06.2007, pay Cess by way of deduction

¶158

4- It is the contention of the Writ Petitioner herein that in respect of present contract, there i IS no provision made-out i in the estimates of the tender notice and the agreement executed do not cover the Labour Cess. It is further submitted that the Irrigation Department unilaterally cannot authorise to recover the Labour Cess from the Contractors bills, without consent of the contractor or entering into supplemental agreement by including suitable provision of 1% Labour Cess in the revised estimate. It is, therefore submitted that the direction i issued by the Finance and Planning Department ISi wholly without jurisdiction and it is therefore arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

¶159

Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has furnished a copy of the Order passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Court i in CH.V.V. Subba Rao Us. Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary and Others (W P-No. 11269 of 2009 & batch dated 22.10.2009) and submitted that this issue is no more res Integra and the law. as settled by this Court in the above judgment has become final.

¶160

This Court has perused the Order passed by the Learned Single Judge in CH.V.V. Subba Rao Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary and Others (W.P.No.11269 of 2009

¶161

¶162

& batch dated 22.10.2009). The relevant portion of the Judgment is usefully

¶163

extracted hereunder;

¶164

“Independent of the said note, the departments of the Government are expected to recognize their obligation under 1996 Act. Assuming that there existed any justification for their omission to include the amount payable towards cess in the estimates, they cannot be permitted to V- V deduct that amount while making payments to the contractors. In a way, it would amount to either penalizing the contractor or affecting the levy contrary to the provisions of 1996 Act. The consequences that flow from any violation of 1996 Act must in fact be directed towards agency that has undertaken construction. Therefore, the inescapable conclusion is that the occasion for an agency to deduct the cess under the Cess Act f would arise only when the corresponding amount is included in the estimates. Conversely, if the amount representing the cess, is not included in the estimates, deductions cannot be made while making payments to the contractors.

¶165

Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing^that:- (a) the respondents shall include 1% cess in the estimates for the works which they propose to undertake, if the work continues for or beyond twelve months and involves engagement of 10 workers or more; and (b) the respondents shall not deduct any amount towards cess, unless the corresponding amount is included in the estimates."

¶166

Having considered the facts of this case and the Order passed by the Learned Single Judge in CH.V.V. Subba Rao Vs. Government of Andhra

¶167

Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary and Others (W.P.No.11269 of 2009 & batch dated 22.10.2009), which has attained finality, this Court is of the view that the present case is squarely covered by the Order of Learned Single Judge in the above mentioned case.

¶168

In this view of the mater, this Writ Petition stands allowed in terms of

¶169

the directions given in CH.V.V. Subba Rao /s. Government of Andhra

¶170

¶171

t K

¶172

Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary and Others

¶173

(W.P.No. 11269 of 2009 & batch dated 22.10.2009). No^{OrderastoCosts.}

¶174

Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this Order.

¶175

That Rule Nisi has been made absolute as above witness the Honourable Sri Dhiraj Singh Thakur, The Chief Justice on this Tuesday, The Thirtieth Day of July, Two Thousand and Twenty Four.

¶176

Sd/- M.SURYANADHA REDDY DEPUTY^EpiSTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶181

The Deputy Financial Advisor and E.O.D.S. to Government, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶182

The Principal Secretary, Transport, Roads and Buildings Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶183

The Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department,^{GovernmentofAndhra} Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶184

The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶185

The Director of Works Accounts, Pay & Accounts Office^{NearExhibition} Grounds, Hyderabad.

¶186

The Engineer in Chief, (P.R.) PMGSY., Erramanzil, Hyderabad.

¶187

The Chief Engineer, (P.R.) N.A.B.A.R.D Erramanzil, Hyderabad.

¶188

The Engineer - in - Chief, (P.R.) Administration Erramanzil, Hyderabad.

¶189

The Engineer - in - Chief, (R & B) PMGSY., Administration & N.H., Erramanzil, Hyderabad.

¶190

The Engineer - in - Chief, (R & B) Roads, Erramanzil, Hyderabad.

¶191

The Managing Director, (R & B) APRDC., Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

¶192

The Chief Engineer, (R &B) NABARD, Hyderabad.

¶193

¶194

The Engineer - in - Chief, APIIC. Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶195

The Superintending Engineer, P.R. Srikakulam, Srikakulam^District.

¶196

The Superintending Engineer, P.R. Guntur, Guntur^District.

¶197

The Superintending Engineer, P.R. Ongole, Prakasam^District.

¶198

The Superintending Engineer, R & B Guntur, Guntur^District.

¶199

The Superintending Engineer, R & B Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶200

The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶201

The Superintending Engineer, R & B N.H., Vijayawada,^{KrishnaDistrict.}

¶202

The Superintending Engineer, Agricultural Marketing Hyderabad.

¶203

The Commissioner, The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶204

The Executive Engineer, (P.R.) Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶205

The Executive Engineer, R & B Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶206

The Zonal Manager, Special Project Zone Industrial Estate, Visakhapatnam.

¶207

The Executive Engineer, (P.R.) Srikakulam, Srikakulam^District.

¶208

The Executive Engineer, (P.R.) Palakonda, Srikakulam^District.

¶209

The Zonal Manager, APIIC. Industrial Estate, Visakhapatnam.

¶210

The Chief Engineer, Visakhapatnam Port Trust Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶211

The Executive Engineer, (P.R.) Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram^District.

¶212

The Superintending Engineer, R & B Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District.

¶213

The Superintending Engineer, R & B Srikakulam,^{SrikakulamDistrict.}

¶214

The Executive Engineer, R & B Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram^District.

¶215

¶216

¶217

The Executive Engineer, R & B Srikakulam, Srikakulam^District.

¶218

The Executive Engineer, R & B Tekali, Srikakulam^District.

¶219

The Executive Engineer, R & B Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram^District.

¶220

The Executive Engineer, P.R. Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram^District.

¶221

The Executive Engineer, P.R. Eluru, West Godavari^District.

¶222

The Executive Engineer, P.R. Jangareddygudem, West Godavari District.

¶223

One CC to SRI. RAMA RAO GHANTA, Advocate [OPUC]

¶224

Two CCs to GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS, High Court Of^Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶225

One CC to SRI. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY (SC FOR GVMC) Advocate [OPUC]

¶226

Two CCs to GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV, High^CourtOf Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶227

Two CCs to GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV, High^CourtOf Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶228

One CC to SRI. P SRI RAGHU RAM Advocate [OPUC]

¶229

One CC to SRI. M VIDYASAGAR Advocate [OPUC]

¶230

Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV , High^CourtOf Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶231

Two CCs to GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING, High Court^OfAndhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶232

Two CCs to GP FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶233

Two CCs to GP FOR AGRICULTURE, High Court Of Andhra^Pradesh. [OUT]

¶234

One CC to SRI. P ROY REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

¶235

Three CD Copies csb

csb

HIGH COURT

DATED:30/07/2024

ORDER

WP.No.24237 of 2010

^ 0 6 JAN 2C25 Co
‘2-
. Current Section ^ ^

¶242

ALLOWING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS

Jasti Venkateswara Rao v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jasti Venkateswara Rao v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Venkata Ratnam Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary

M/s. R.M. Mohite and Company, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

P. Appala Naidu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

M/s. Ushodaya Wines, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

B.Munuswamy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Dharmala Somulamma Vs the State of Ap