Dismissed

K. Peddaiah, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its

Andhra Pradesh HC25 Sept 2024WP/24228/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitioner challenged an eviction memo and sought interim relief. Counsel submitted the cause of action had ceased. The High Court found the petition infructuous and dismissed it, staying further proceedings on interlocutory applications.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no order on costs; interlocutory applications closed.

K. Peddaiah, Vs Government of Andhra… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

¶4

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 24228 OF 2014

¶8

Between:

¶9

K. Peddaiah, S/o Rosaiah, Aged about 36 years, occ: Business, Shop No.1 Sivalayam Shops, Akulavari Street, Mallikharjunapeta, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its. Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Commissioner of Endowments, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.

¶14

Sri Durga Malleswara Swamy Varla Devasthanam, Indrakeeladri, Vijayawada, Krishna District, Represented by its Executive^Officer.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Memo in Rc.No.C1/540/20 14, dated 10.08.2014 issued by the 3'"'^ respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the procedure contemplated under Section 83 and 84 of the Act and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

¶17

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2014rWPMP. NO: 30321 OF 2014)

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings in pursuance of Memo, in Rc.No.Cl/540/2014, dated 10.08.2014 Including eviction of the petitioner from Shop No.1 of Sri Durga Malleswara Swamy Devasthanam^situatedat Sivalayam Shopping Complex, Indrakeeladri, Vijayawada pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶19

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP. NO: 2898 OF 20141

¶20

Between:

¶21

Sh Durga Malleswara Swamy Varla Devasthanam, Indrakeeladri, Vijayawada, Krishna District, Represented by its Executive^Officer.

¶22

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT N0.3

¶23

AND

¶24

K. Peddaiah, S/o Rosaiah, Aged about 36 years, occ: Business, Shop No.1, Sivalayam Shops, Akulavari Street, Mallikharjunapeta, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶25

...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

¶26

Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its. Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶27

The Commissioner of Endowments, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.

¶28

...RESPONDENTS

¶29

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be

¶30

¶31

pleased to vacate the interim orders dt. 19.08.2014^{madeinWP.NO.24228} of 2014.

¶32

LA. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 48628 OF 2015)

¶33

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the 3rd respondent to file additional^{counteraffidavit.}

¶34

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PRAKASH BUDDARAPU

¶35

Counsel for the Respondent 1 & 2: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

¶36

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: —

¶37

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶38

¶39

APHC010771552014

¶40

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶41

[3310]

¶42

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶43

THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶44

PRESENT

¶45

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶46

WRIT PETITION NO: 24228/2014

Between:

K. Peddaiah

...PETITIONER

AND

Government Of Andhra Pradesh Represented By Its and ...RESPONDENT{S) Others

¶52

Counsel for the Petitioner;

¶53

1.PRAKASH BUDDARAPU

¶54

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶55

1 .GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP)

¶56

2.ELEVATED AS JUDGE

¶57

The Court made the following:

¶58

ORDER:

¶59

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Prakash Buddarapu, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause In the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.

¶60

¶61

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as

¶62

infructuous. No order as to costs.

¶63

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands

¶64

closed.

¶65

//TRUE COPY//

¶66

SD/-U. SRIDEVI as^tantregistrar sectionofficer

¶67

To.

¶68

One CC to Sri Prakash Buddarapu Advocate [OPUC]

¶69

Two CCS to GP for Endowments, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶70

Three CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/09/2024

ORDER

WP.No.24228 of 2014

ANOH^
2 5 FEB 2025
s
^ . Current Section
£gSPATC^^

¶78

DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS

K. Peddaiah, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Peddaiah, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V Nagaraju Vs the State of Ap

M/s Krishna District Milk Producers Mutually Aided Cooperative Vs the State of Ap

M/s Krishna District Milk Producers Mutually Aided Cooperative Union Limited, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Slv Stone Crushers Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

B.S.V.S. Dharmavathar Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh

G Ramu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh