Writ petition from 2003 dismissed for default after repeated absence of representation for the petitioner on three successive postings, including under the caption 'For Dismissal'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3504]
APHC010030712003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 23901/2003
Between:
Smt. P. Bharathi, W/o. Sri B. Raja Gopal, Anantapur Dist.
...PETITIONER
AND
The Government Of A P Hyderabad and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.K RAM REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following order:
There is no representation for the petitioner today also.
representation for the petitioner. The matter stands posted to 15.11.2024. On that day also, there was no representation for the petitioner.
caption “For Dismissal”.
2
also. As such, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be
no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any shall stand closed.
_______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J
Date: 21.11.2024 MJA
3
04
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 23901 of 2003
21.11.2024
MJA
Smt. P. Bharathi
The Government of A P Hyderabad and Others
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
