The petitioner failed to appear despite being posted 'for dismissal' on previous dates. The Court dismissed the writ petition for default, citing absence of the petitioner on 14.11.2024 and 21.11.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010142642004
[3504]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13749/2004
Between:
Y.china Veerabhadra Rao
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Bank Of India Anr and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KAMLA SEELAM B
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.V UMA DEVI
3.B G RAVINDER REDDY
The Court made the following order:
There is no representation for the petitioner today also.
representation for the petitioner.
caption “For Dismissal”.
2
also. As such, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be
no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any shall stand closed.
_______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J
Date: 21.11.2024 MJA
3
72
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 13749 of 2004
21.11.2024
MJA
Y.china Veerabhadra Rao
The State Bank Of India Anr and Others
MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
