Writ petition under Article 226 seeking declaration against a revenue letter and orders for perjury was dismissed as non-prosecution due to the petitioner's counsel being unable to be served.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
T
ft
o V'
"v.
Or.
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 23379 OF 2012
Between:
Maripalli Bhasker Satyanarayana, S/o. Raghava Kumar, aged about 50 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 274, Baba Metta, APHB Colony, Vizianagaram.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
(R6 is Impleaded as per C.O.dt.25/9/12 in WPMP.35835/12)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature, of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Letter in Rc.No.L2/33603/2010 dt.27.7.2010 issues by the 1 respondent, when the order in Rc.No.3039/02A dt.9.10.2009 passed by the 4**^ respondent has become final which was passed pursuant to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court dt.28.4.2009 in W.P. No. 18831 of 2007 and as being illegal, arbitrary, unwarranted, contrary Sec. 22-A (A.P. State Amendment of the Registration Act, 1908 and also in violation of Art. 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also declare the action of the 5*'^ respondent in swearing to a false affidavit filed in support of W.P. No. 18831 of 2007 tantamount to perjury and consequently set aside the impugned letter and punish the 5*^ respondent for perjury.
j.A. NO: 2 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 35835 OF 20121
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead Neelayamma Choultry, Dakamarri Village, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Rep; by its Executive Officer" as 6*^ respondent both in the WPMP.No.29867/2012 and WP.No.23379/2012.
.A. NO: 1 OF 2012rWPMP. NO: 29867 OF 2012^
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Letter in Rc.No.L2/33603 /2010 dt.27-07-2010 issued by the 1®‘ respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.KARUNA SAGAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Respondents No.3 & 4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI V.S.K.RAMA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI V T M PRASAD
The Court made the following: ORDER
1
/
APHC010175892012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3310]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 23379/2012
Between:
Maripalli Bhasker Satyanarayana, S/o. Raghava ...PETITIONER Kumar
AND
The Commissioner Endowments Department ...RESPONDENT(S) and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.M KARUNA SAGAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.VS KRAMA RAO
2.GP FOR REVENUE
3.VTM PRASAD
4.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)
5.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following order:
I
The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India, seeking the following relief:
“....to issue a Writ, order or direction particularlyin the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the Letterin
2
Rc.No.L2/33603/2010 dated 27.07.2010 issued by thef respondent, when the order in Rc.No.3039/02A dated 09.10.2009 passed by the 4'^ respondent has become final which was passed pursuant to the orders passedby this Hon’bie Court dated 28.04.2009 in W.P.No.18831of 2007 and as being illegal, arbitrary, unwarranted, contrary to Sec.22-A (A.P State Amendment) of the Registration Act, 1908 and also In violation of Art.14and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also declarethe action of the 5^^ respondent in swearing to a falseaffidavit filed in support of W.P.No.18831 of 2007 tantamountto perjury and consequently set aside the impugned letter and punish the S''’ respondent for perjury and passsuch other order or orders as this Hon’bie Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. ”
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, ifany,shall
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 17/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.23379of2012
^ 0 ^ MAR 2025
^ * Current Section
DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON-PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS
Maripalli Bhasker Satyanarayana
Commissioner, Endowments Department, Government of A.P.
Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Visakhapatnam
Joint Sub Registrar I, RO (OB) Vizianagaram
Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizianagaram
Sri B. Trimurthulu
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
