Writ petition challenging an order under the A.P. Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2006 was dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's counsel's request, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY. THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI WRIT PETITION NO: 22891 OF 2011
Between:
,/
Palakuri Kalidas, S/o Late Jagannadham, aged 53 years.BusinessD.No.4-3-33. Kotha Agraharam. 2nd lane. Vizianagaram. VizianagaramDistrict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
etition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularlyoneinthenatureof Mandamus declaring the action of the 2 nd and 3 rd respondents in passing order dt. 9.12.2010 in proceedings No. 149/2010/SA without considering the explanation filed by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary,violativeofArticle14and 21 of Constitution of India and contrary to the provisionandrulesmadeunder A.P. Agricultural Land (Conversion for non-AgriculturalPurposes)Act,2006and consequently set aside the order Dt.9.12.2010 in proceedingsNo.149/2010/SA. LA. NO: 1 OF 2011 (WPMP. NO: 27991 OF 2011)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased grant stay of all further proceedings pursuanttoorderDt.9.12.2010In proceedings No. 149/2010/SA pending the above writpetition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. T. V. SRI DEVI
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
a
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION No.2289l of 2011
»■ iJUDGME^IT:-'•5 •> .-rj•> t. 3Vi 11 \ u r. «>ilf T. V. Sridevi, learned counsel for the petitionerhas s r i ¥'■j ^^^feitted^a letter dated 02.01.2024 to the Registrar (Judicial),
‘i. \
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on record submitting asfollows:
C(In the above writ petition, the writ petitioner
through letter dt. 18.12.2023 instructed me to withdraw the writ petition. Hence, I request your Honour todirect the Registry to post the W.P.No.22891' of 2011 underthe caption “for withdrawal” in the cause list as per rosterso
as to enable me to withdraw the writ petition.
Thanking You. »
Sri N. Venkateshwar, learned counsel, representing
Ms. T. V. Sridevi, learned counsel for the petitionersubmitsthat the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn.
- Learned counsel for the respondents has no
objection.
- In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
y.
2
(is
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,
PT
shall also stand closed.
SD/- M PRABHAKAR RAO
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
/
//TRUE COPY//
t /
SECTION OFFICER
To,
- One CC to M/s T. V. SRI DEVI Advocate [OPUC]
- Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
- Three C.D Copies
Nm
MBT
0.
HIGH COURT
DATED;! 0/01/2024
ORDER
WP.No.22891 of 2011
...
Oi-l
M X 0 3 JUl. 2®
Ci ..jgtiiOn _
•CL*
DISMISSING THE WP AS
WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Palakuri Kalidas
The District Collector, Vizianagaram District
The Competent Authority & Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizianagaram
The Tahsildar, Cheepurupalli, Vizianagaram District
Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
