Writ petitioner failed to appear and argue. The learned counsel for the respondent requested adjournment but was denied. The court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution without costs.
Writ of Mandamus dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION NO: 11917 OF 2014
Between:
Thupili Madhusudhana Reddy, S/o. Sundara Rami Reddy, Aged 63 years. Occupation; Agriculture, Resident of Flat No. 304, Mars Pyramid Apartment, Saras4athi Nagar, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. ...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, preferably,oneinthenatureofWritof Mandamus declaring the order of the 2"^^ respondent in Case No. D. Dis. (E8) 3953/2013 dated 07.03.2014 as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India by setting aside the said order and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to issue a No Objection Certificate do the petitioner in respect of the land covered by Sy. No. 82/1 and 82/2, in all admeasuring Ac.39.90 cents, situate in Vedicherla Village, Gudur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 14992 OF 20141
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner in respect of the land covered by Sy. No. 82/1 and 82/2, in all admiring Ac.39.90 cents, situate in Vedicherla Village, Gudur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, pending disposal of the above writ.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI LEELA PRASAD MALLELA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION No. 11917 of 2014
JUDGMENT:
Sri Leela Prasad Mallela, learned counsel for the petitioner, is not present.
costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in
consequence.
Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
ssb gl
-A-P
HIGH COURT
DATED:03/01/2024
ORDER
WP.No.11917of 2014
%'i<^
DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Thupili Madhusudhana Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The District Collector, SPSR Nellore District
The Joint Collector, SPSR Nellore District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gudur
The Tahsildar Gudur Mandal
Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
