Dismissal of a writ petition for want of prosecution due to lack of intimation from the petitioner and efflux of time.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 2215/2006
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
The petitioner has challenged the order dated 07.03.2005 passed by the A.P.Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in O.A.No.5520 of 2009.
“On the request made by Ms. M. Siva Jyothi, learned counsel, representing Sri M. Jagannatha Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner that he has undergone eye surgery, list on 22.07.2024.
2. No further adjournment will be granted as the matter pertains to the year 2006 and is listed under the caption of ‘Specially Identified Cases’. “
2
_____________________
RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
_____________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J
Date: 22.07.2024 Pab
3
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 2215/2006
Date:- 22.07.2024
Pab
Petitioner
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
