Dismissed as infructuous at counsel's request; petitioner had sought payment of compassionate allowance after removal from railway service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
L
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
friday/the NINETEENTH DAY OF-JOLY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
fS
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VtJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 19770 OF 2012 -
Between:
A.JOHN ZERARD, PRAKASHAM DIST, S/o F.Anthony.Aged 50 years Occ: Sr.Trollyman (Under orders of removal from service) Signals/Renigunta, South Central Railway R/o PradhanaMandiram,Elchur Post & Village Santamangulur Mandal, Prakasham District Andhra Pradesh.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more in thenature of Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate Writ calling forthe recordspertainingto order dt 19-09-2011 in O.A.No.1287 of 2010 of the Honble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench as illegal, arbitrary and Consequently direct the respondents here in to arrangethepayment of Compassionate Allowance which was sanctioned to thePetitionerbytheR- 3 from the date of his removal
LA. NO: 2 OF 2Q12(WPMP. NO: 25343 OF 20121
I.A. NO: 1
nF ?ni2(WPMP. NO: 24781 OF 2012)
imripr Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances Petition of the petition, the High Court may be stated in the affidavit filed in support re-submitting the case pleased to condone the delay of 02) d y Sr.No.70707 of 2012 in the interest of justice
I.A. NO
■ fi OF 2012(WPMP. no- 113164 OF 2012_1
o ppp nravino that in the circumstances stated inte'arda^it filed'in support of the petition, the High Court ntay be pleased MS -P y Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI K SUDHAKAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents; P GANGA RAMI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: R S MURTHY (ADD CGSC)
The Court made the following ORDER .
mi'
APHC010156822012
SES
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3470]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY .THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
!
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 19770/2012
Between:
A.john Zerard.prakasham Dist
...PETITIONER
AND
Union Of India Div Railway Mg 2 and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KSUDHAKAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.PGANGA RAMI REDDY 2.R S MURTHY (ADD CGSC) The Court made the following:
ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)
Sri M.S.P.Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri K. Sudhakar Reddy,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by afflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous.
\
2- Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, mi miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
To.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/. P VENKAT RAMANA Jo/ntJreg/strar SEG^ficWoFFlCER
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.19770 of 2012
^X. 0 3 OCT 202^1 ™
^ . Current Section
*® “'=™<=TUOUS
A. John Zerard
Union of India, Div. Railway Mg., rep by its Divisional Railway Manager, Guntakal Division, S.C.Railway
The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Guntakal Division, S.C.Railway
The Senior Divisional Signal & Telecommunication Engineer, Guntakal Division, S.C.Railway
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
