Writ petition concerning a college attender's claim to continue in service until age 62 with payment of pending salaries was dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioner's request; no order was passed on merits and no costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 21867 OF 2023
Between:
Shaik Subhan, S/o Shaik Masthan Aged about 60 Years, R/o. D.No.30/30 Malakapatnam, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh 521001.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the proceedings issued by 5th Respondent dated 01-08-2023 and not paying the complete salary from the year 2017 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14,16, Article 19(1) (f) and 21 of the Constitution of India and Violation of Section 78A of Andhra Pradesh Education Act 1982 as amended by Andhra Pradesh (Amendment) Act, 2023 and Section 3 of Andhra Pradesh employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) Act 1984, as amended by G.M.Os No.15 dated 31-012022 and APHERMC regulation and guidelines consequently to set aside proceedings dated 01-08-2023 of Respondent No. 5 declaringthatthe age of superannuation for Non-teaching staff is 62 years and to further declare Petitioner is entitled to continue in service of Respondent No.5 College till attaining the age of 62 years with all consequential benefits of increments etc., and further direct the 5‘^ respondent to pay all the pending salaries to the petitioner from the year 2017 with penal interest.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondents to continue the Petitioner in service as Attender till he attains 62 years after suspending the proceedings dated 01 08-2023 of Respondent No. 5 college.
lA NO: 2 OF 202.^
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i in support of the petition, the High Court may be
pleased to direct 5‘^ respondents to pay all the pending salaries to the petitioner from the year 2017.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Between:
Daita Madhusudana Sastry, Sri Venkateswara Hindu College of Engineering Rep by its Principal, Machilipatnam, Krishna District.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT N0.5
AND
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be
pleased to vacate the interim order dated 24-08-2023 passed in WP.No.21867 of 2023 and dismiss it with costs.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. PONNADA SREE WAS
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 & 2: GP FOR SERVICES III Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI I.MADHU BABU (SC FOR JNTU) Counsel for the Respondent No.3 & 5: NONE The Court made the following; ORDER
APHC010425392023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
[3331]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 21867/2023
Between:
Shaik Subhan
...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.PONNADA SREE VYAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR SERVICES in
2.K V ADITYA CHOWDARY
The Court made the following ORDER :
In pursuance of letter dated 12.09.2024 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
/
✓
Page 2 of 3
W.P.No.21867 of 202?
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.Noorderasto
costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall standclosed.
Sd/- A. VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
MBT
PRK
HIGH COURT
DATED:17/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.21867 of 2023
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS WITHDRAWN
WITHOUT COSTS
Shaik Subhan
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Commissioner, State Board of Technical Education and Training
All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE)
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU)
Daita Madhusudana Sastry, Sri Venkateswara Hindu College of Engineering
Subba Reddy Satti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
