A shift operator alleged he was barred from duty without notice and sought mandamus to resume work. Counsel sought leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach an appropriate forum; the court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/ 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 20327 OF 2024
Between:
Durgampati Subrahmanyam, S/o. Seenaiah, Aged about 22 years, Occ Shift Operator, Working at 33/11 KV Kondlapudi Sub-Station, Nellore Rural, R2 Section, APSPDCL. R/o. Kommarapudi Village,NelloreRural Mandal S.P.S.R. Nellore District. ...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or directions more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner as shift operator at 33/11 KV, Kondlapudi SubStation, Nellore Rural-ll, S.P.S.R. Nellore District without assigning any reason or issuing any notice and without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to attend his duty as shift operator at 33/11 KV, Kondlapudi Sub-Station, Nellore Rural-ll, S.P.S.R. Nellore District. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as shift operator at 33/11 KV, Kondlapudi Sub-Station, Nellore Rural-ll, S.P.S.R. Nellore District, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. DODDAKA HARSHA VARDHAN
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following: ORDER
t. i
APHC010394222024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3331]
TUESDAY .THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 20327/2024
Between:
Durgampati Subrahmanyam
...PETITIONER
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh and 7 others. ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri D.Harsha Vardhan, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate forum.
Permission is accorded.
7 /
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
To,
SECTtON OFFICER
GSSK
HIGH COURT
DATED: 17/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.20327 of 2024
8"
3 0 SEP 202'!
HO C9
^ Current Section
DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Durgampati Subrahmanyam
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The A.P. Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd.
Subba Reddy Satti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
