A cooperative bank cashier challenged his retirement at age 58 as contrary to Act 4 of 2014 and subsequent proceedings. At hearing, counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 21294 OF 2016
Between:
S.R.M.Rama Bhupathi Dev, S/o Surya Narayana Rama Bhupathi Dev, Aged about 58 years, working as Cashier, Jangareddygudem Branch, District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., Eluru, West GodavariDistrict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ or any other order or direction
(
h s
€
particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaringtheactionof the respondents in trying to retire the petitionerat the ageof 58 years is contrary to Act 4 of 2014 dated 27-06-2014 and also in violation of Proceedings dated 10-08-2015, 12-08-2015, 22-08-2015and11.12.2015is arbitrary and illegal and set aside the same consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service inviewoftheProceedings dated 10-08-2015, 12-08-2015 and 22-08-2015 in the interest of justice.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 26122 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service in accordance with Act 4 of 2014 pending disposal of theWritPetition in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI M SHALINI
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI K BHARAT RAM,SCFORCOOP BANK
Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2 : GP FOR AGRICULTURE
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010623412016
■ i
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
FRIDAY .THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 21294/2016
Between:
S.r.m.rama Bhupathi Dev, Wg Dist
...PETITIONER
AND
PrI Secretary AgrI Coop Dept Hyd 2 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.M SHALINI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
3.GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP)
The Court made the following:
m
€
ORDER;
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mrs.M.Shalini,learnedcounsel for the petitioner(s) sought permission of this Courttowithdrawthepresent Writ Petition. To that effect, she has also filed aletterdated10.09.2024tothe Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
Considering the above submission, permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall
be no order as to costs.
stand As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
closed.
Sd/- M SRiNIVAS I ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I
//TRUE COPY//
S OFFICER
To,
[OUT]
HIGH COURT
DATED: 13/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.21294 of 2016
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
3 provisions across 3 enactments
S.R.M.Rama Bhupathi Dev
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperation Department
Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar of Co-operative Societies
The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd., Eluru
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
