Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus against police and revenue officials barring him from entering and cultivating agricultural land, alleging violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A. The State submitted it is a civil dispute and authorities would not interfere; the writ petition was closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I 4 A
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
a'
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBEfigJf^
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR 'Ol. a
o
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTH^^
WRIT PETITION NO: 162fifi OF 2024
Between:
Reddy, S/o. Satyanarayana Reddy, Aged about M^'dXY.s'i^DisS'"""' 'Ullage, R.S.'''Ko^dapuram
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated i in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly
one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.3 and 4 m directing the petitioner not to enter the land in an extent of Ac. 1.43 cents in Sy.No.305/1/PI Ac. 1.02 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P2, Ac.0.37 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P3, Ac.0.87 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P4, Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P5, Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P6 and Ac.0.70 cents in Sy.No.305/2 and Ac.2.38 cents in Sy.No.308 of Bedudur Village, Kondapuram Mandal, Y.S.R District and not to carryout agriculture works at the behest of the respondents No.7 to 8 as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the well established legal principles, apart from being violative of the fundamental and the Constitutional rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.3 and 4 not to interfere with the rights of the petitioner over the land in an extent of an extent of Ac 1 43 cents in Sy,No.305/1/PI, Ac.1.02 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P2, Ac.0.37 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P3, Ac.0.87 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P4, Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P5, Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P6 and Ac.0.70 cents in Sy.No.305/2 and Ac.2.38 cents in Sy.No.308 of Bedudur Village Kondapuram Mandal, Y.S.R District
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i m support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 & 4 not to interfere with the agricultural activity being carried by the petitioner over the land in an extent of an extent of Ac. 1.43 cents in Sy.No.305/l/P1, Ac.1.02 cents i n Sy.No.305/l/P2 Ac.0.37 cents in Sy.No.305/I/P3, Ac.0.87 cents in Sy.No.305/l/P4, Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.305/l/P5 Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.305/l/P6 and Ac.0.70 cents in Sy.No.305/2 and Ac.2.38 cents in Sy.No.308 of Bedudur Village, Kondapuram Mandal , Y.S.R District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V R REDDY KOWURI
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3 and 8: ASST GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondents No. 4, 5: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondents No.6 and 7: None
The Court made the following; Order
APHC010320872024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3368]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 16255/2024
Between:
Kanchamreddy Adinarayana Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
The State of AP and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.VR REDDY KOWURI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof
India is filed for the following relief;
2
Ac. 1.02 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P2, Ac.0.37 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P3, Ac.0.87 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P4, Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P5, Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P6 and Ac.0.70 cents in Sy.No.305/2 and Ac. 2.38 cents in Sy.No.308 of Bedudur Village, Kondapuram Mandal Y S R District and not to carryout agriculture works at the behest of the respondents No 7 to 8 as arbitrary illegal contraryto the well established legal principles apart from being violative of the fundamental and the Constitutional rights guaranteed to under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and conseguently direct the respondents No 3 and 4 not to interfere with the rights of the petitioner over the land in an extent of an extent of Ac. 1.43 cents in Sy.No. 305/1/PI, Ac. 1.02 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P2, Ac.0.37 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P3, Ac.0.87 cents in Sy.No 305/1/P4, Ac.0.06 cents In Sy.No.305/1/P5, Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.305/1/P6 and Ac.0.70 cents in Sy.No. 305/2 and Ac.2.38 cents in Sy.No.308 of Bedudur Village, Kondapuram Mandal Y S R District and to pass...”
- Heard Sri D.Vigneswar Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, learned counsel for the petitioner.
3
preliminary enquiry reveal that it is a civil dispute and they will never interfere in such disputes.
Pleader for Home are placed on record.
As a sequel thereto, the interlocutory applications, if any
pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- M. SRINIVA«i assistant REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
se(5tion OFFICER
gsg
HIGH COURT
DATED: 19/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.16255 of 2024
^ 2 7 SEP 202^
^ Current Section
CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether police and revenue authorities could bar the petitioner from entering and cultivating specified agricultural land in Bedudur Village.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kanchamreddy Adinarayana Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa
B V L N Chakravarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
