A writ petition challenging a temple endowment auction notice filed in 2012; counsel submitted the cause no longer survived and the court dismissed it as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
'O figi
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 20310 OF 2012
Between:
K Srinivasa Rao, S/o K.Venkata Narasaiah Hindu, aged 45 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o Putlagudem (V) Atchampet Mandal, Guntur District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the notice dated 28-6-2012, issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and set aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents to follow due process of law.
I.A, NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 26044 OF 2012^
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant Stay of all further proceedings arising out of
: SRI. Y KOTESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Petitioner ; GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent :ORDER The Court made the following
J APHC010616172012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI •.fcm (Special Original Jurisdiction)
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 20310/2012
Between:
K Srinivasa Rao, Guntur Dist
...PETITIONER
AND
Person Incharge S K R S V Devasthanam Guntur Dist Anr and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.Y KOTESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, MrRamaKoteswara Rao, learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr Y.Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition isdismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
AOO.O Sd/-K. L. PAVANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION (^inCER
To,
KM
/
HIGH COURT
[)ATE;D:22/08/2024
ORDER
WP.NIo.20310of 2012
ANO*^
O
2 1 FEB 2025
. Current Section .
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS VVITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Should the notice dated 28-6-2012 issued by the first respondent be declared illegal and set aside?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K Srinivasa Rao
The Person Incharge, Sri Kodanda Rama Swamy Vari Devasthanam
The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Guntur
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
