The High Court, Andhra Pradesh, dismissed Writ Petition No.17122 of 2004 as infructuous, noting that proceedings were withdrawn and benefits were granted, without awarding costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FKIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
. WRIT PETITION NO: 17122 OF 2004
Between:
...Petitioners
AND
R.Appala Naidu, S/o Late Appala Swamy, Retd.Telephone Supervisor R/o H.No.1-23/1-91, Mahanti Street, Kanpaka, VizianagaramDistrict.
...Respondent
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records pertaining to the orders dated 22-04-2004 of Hon ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in OA No.285/2003 and to issue a Writ mostly in the nature of Certiorari and to declare the orders of the Tribunal as contrary to law and set aside the same.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2004fWPMP. NO: 22458 OF 2004}
Petition undfer Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the orders dated 22-04-2004 of Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in OA No.285/2003 pending final disposal of Writ Petition.
LA, NO: 1 OF 2005rWVMP. NO1275 OF 2005)
{ .
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the W,P,M.P.No.22458 of 2004 in WP,No,17122 of 2004 , on 11-4-2005.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SMT K.ARUNA FOR SRI B.NARASIMHA SARMA
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI HANUMANTHA
RAO.V
The Court made the following order:
! I
4
APHC010170502004
0;^;s
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3470]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 17122/2004
Between:
The Chief General Manager, and Others ...PETITIONER{S)
AND
R Appala Naidu and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
M.B NARASIMHA SARMA
2.K ARUNA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Sri K.Aruna, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that writ petition has become infructuous, as the proceedings against respondents have already been withdrawn by the petitioners andtheservicebenefitshave been given to the petitioner.
t
- Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any,shallstandclosed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- S.SRINIVASA PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SEC ■^t^T^ficer
RAM
r-v
HIGH COURT
*♦
^4 0
DATED: 19/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.17122 of 2004
.c--.
h
■ 0. ^ug T-
•ii-: 20?if
* >>. Ol>
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
\ .V
4 f
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is infructuous in the circumstances.
The Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Govt.of India Enterprise, Hyderabad
R Appala Naidu
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Nyopathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
