Contempt case alleging wilful disobedience of a High Court order dated 31.10.2023 in W.P.No.25712 of 2023. Petitioner's counsel submitted the respondents had complied with the orders; recording this, the court closed the contempt case with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF- ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1138 OF 2024
Contempt case U/s.10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the Respondents herein for willfully violating, disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 31.10.2023 in W.P.No.25712 of 2023.
Between:
Y Venkata Narayana, S/o. Y Nagaiah, Aged about 52 years, Occ; Contractor, R/o. 4-160, Meerapuram Village, Banaganapalli Mandal, Kurnool District.
...Petitioner/Writ Petitioner
AND
...Respondents/Respondents 1 to 4
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BATHALA RAMESH
Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. S SIVA KUMARI
The Court made the following:
APHC010083882024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1138/2024
Between;
Y Venkata Narayana ...PETITIONER
AND
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar las and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.BATHALA RAMESH
Counsel for the Contemnor{S):
1.S SIVA KUMARI
The court made the following ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwilful disobedience of the orders dated 31.10.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.25712of2023.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counselforthe petitioner submits that the respondents have compliedwiththeorders dated 31.10.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 25712 of 2023, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case isclosed. No order as to costs.
2
Consequently , Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the
shall stand closed. contempt case
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- K TATA RAO deputy registrar SECTlS^^FFlCER
To
Rami Reddy, Executive Engineer
sree
HIGH COURT
DATED:07/11/2024
ORDER
CC.No.1138 of 2024
A%* 15 MAK 2025 OVCo. I
^ Current oucuon . ^
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Y Venkata Narayana
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar, IAS
Sri Shamsheer Singh Rawat, IAS
Sri P Reddy Sekhar Reddy
Sri B Raghu Rami Reddy
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
