27. In Ravindra Kumar (supra) on consideration of various previous pronouncements including Larger Bench Judgment in the case of Avtar Singh v. Union of India5 , Ram Kumar v. State of U.P.6 , Pawan Kumar v. Union of India7 , Mohammed Imran v. State of Maharashtra8 and Satish Chandra Yadav v. Union of India9 , the Hon’ble Apex Court observed and held that t he nature of the office, the timing and nature of the criminal case; the overall consideration of the judgment of acquittal; the nature of the query in the application/verification form; the contents of the character verification reports; the socio economic strata of the individual applying; the other antecedents of the candidate; the nature of consideration and the contents of the cancellation/termination order are some of the crucial aspects which should enter the judicial verdict in adjudging suitability and in determining the nature of relief to be ordered. It was observed that in Satish Chandra Yadav (supra) even the broad principles set out therein recognize that each case should be scrutinized thoroughly by the public employer concerned and the Court is obliged to examine whether the procedure of enquiry adopted by the authority concerned was fair and reasonable. The Hon’ble Apex Court referred the case of Avtar Singh (supra), that while passing the order of cancellation of candidature for giving false information, the employer may take
