A coordinate bench directed a report on postal endorsement dichotomy. The appellant's counsel submitted that the appeal was not pressed. The court dismissed the appeal accordingly without granting costs.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 14 OF 2024
Between:
...APPELLANTS
AND
S Krishna Kumari, W/o T.P. Sivaraman, D/oK.Padmanabha Chetty, aged 52 years, Occ housewife, R/o D.No. 10/3, Floor, Tulasi Nagar, Poombuhar Nagar, 5th Cross, Kolathur, Chennai -99. Tamilnadu State.
...RESPONDENT
Appeal filed Under Order 43 Rule 1 OF Civil Procedure Code, petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Misc. Appeal against the order and Decree in lA. No. 315 / 2021 in O.S. No. 98/2021 on the file of V Additional District Judge, Tirupati dated 04-11-2022 for
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to condone the delay of (271) days in representation of the above CMA .14 of 2024 and to pass such
Counsel for the Appellants: SRI M.S.P. REDDY for SRI. D KRISHNA MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondents: NONE
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
/ /
APHC010154952023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3470]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
&
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
\
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 14/2024
Between:
V Rukmini and Others
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
S Krishna Kumari Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.D KRISHNA MURTHY
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Respondent:
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:-
Sri M.S.P. Reddy, learned counsel appearing for Sri D. Krishna
Murthy, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants do not want to press this appeal and the same may be dismissedas not pressed.
- By order dated 24.06.2024, a Coordinate Bench of this Court directed the Registrar General to seek a report from the postal department with regard to the dichotomy in the endorsement issued by
2
the Postman and the information maintained on the website of the department as noted in the said order. The Registrar General has submitted the report of the postal department. Perused the report.
- Recording the statement made by the learned counsel for the appellants, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall
also stand closed.
SD/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
\ ■
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
PVR
vna
HIGH COURT
DATED: 24/07/2024
JUDGMENT
CMA.No.14 of 2024
o I n nrr 202^ m
★ ^
DISMISSING THE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL AS NOT PRESSED
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is maintainable when the appellant explicitly states they do not wish to press the appeal.
V Rukmini and Others
S Krishna Kumari
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
