The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition for non-prosecution as the petitioners had no interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI .
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOURv/"
V--''
the honourable SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 18115 OF
Between:
Employee, R/o. D. No. 10-1-91 Mehar Nagar. Old Gajuwaka Visakhapatnarn.
...PETITIONERS
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularlyoneinthenatureof writ of mandamus declaring the inaction on the partoftheRespondentNo. 1 and 2 herein in demolishing the compound wall constructedbythe3'"'and4 th Respondents on the 80 feet public road as well on the24feetpublicstreet connecting the colony of Hindustan Shipyard Staff Cooperative Building Society Ltd., to the Simhachalam approach Road so alsorestoringthedrains pipe lines passing through the 80 feet public road,damagedby 3'^'^ and 4 th Respondents by constructing the walls, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being in violation of Art. 300-A oftheConstitutionofIndia,so also in derogation of mandatory provision of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and consequently direct the RespondentNo.1and2to demolish the compound wall constructed by the 3'^'^ and 4‘^ Respondents on the 80 feet public road as well on the 24 feet publicstreetconnectingthe colony of Hindustan Shipyard Staff Co-operative BuildingSocietyLtd.,tothe
Simhachalam approach Road so also restore the drains pipe lines passing through the 80 feet public road.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 22099 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 1®^ and 2'^'' Respondent to take necessary step for demolition of compound wall constructed by the 3^^ and 4*^ Respondents on the 80 feet public road as well on the 24 feet public street connecting the colony of Hindustan Shipyard Staff Cooperative Building Society Ltd. to the Simhachalam approach Road so also restore the drains pipe lines.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C.KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: SRI K.MADHAVA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 & 5: NONE
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010085372013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3332] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18115/2013 Between: Smt. V. Rama Devi, W/o. Late Appala ...PETITIONER(S) Narasimhulu, and Others ^ AND The Greater Visakhapatam Municipal ...RESPONDENT(S) Corporation and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.C KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S)1.1977/GP FOR HOME 2.K MADHAVA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER:
Though the matter ISi listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, today also there i IS no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that, the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the Writ Petition.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
Sd/- M. PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
MBT
t r
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/05/2024
ORDER
WP.No.18115 of 2013
5 19 FEB 2C25
^ . Currerii Section
DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. V. Rama Devi
D. Nageswara Rao
P.V.B. Ramakrishna
A. Konda Babu
K. Ajay Kumar
The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation
Ravi Cheemalapati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
