Contempt case alleging disobedience of High Court orders dated 18.10.2023 in W.P.No.25865 of 2023. Counsel for the petitioner stated the orders had been complied with by the authorities; the court closed the contempt case with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 505 OF 2024
Petition under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the contemnors/respondentsunderthe provisions of contempt of the courts Act for willfully and wontedly violating the orders of this High Court in W.P.No.25827 of 2023 dated 18.10.2023.
Between:
Mudavathu Bikari Naik, S/o. Chinna Naga Naik Age 60 years, Occ: Sarpanch, R/o. 5-251/A, Main Road, Chakalikunta, Vipparla, Rompicherala Mandal, Guntur District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI GOUTHAMI SURAPAREDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SMT.S. SIVA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI SUMON Counsel for the Respondent No.3 :SRI KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI The Court made the following ORDER:
p
APHC010006842024
• ir * v> ■;-4• Vi v ^ *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
[3332]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 505/2024
Between:
Mudavathu Bikari Naik
...PETITIONER
AND
Seshi Bushan Kumar I A S and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.GOUTHAMI SURAPAREDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.SSIVA KUMARI
2.C SUMON
3.KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
The Court made the following:
ORDER
This Contempt Case has been filed complaining disobedience of the orders of this Court dated 18.10.2023 passed in W.P.No.25865of2023.
\
? I
%
Smt. Gouthami Surapareddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the orders of this Court dated 18.10.2023 passed in W.P.no.25865 of 2023 has duly been complied with bytheauthorities.
In view of the above, nothing remains for consideration in this writ
petition and therefore the same is liable to be closed.
Therefore, this Contempt Case is closed. There shallbenoorderasto
costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,shallstandclosed.
Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated.
Sd/- A. VENUGOPAL RAO
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
♦
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/05/2024
ORDER
CC.NO.505 of 2024
5 o?^ ov m)‘ fg 2 7 AU6 202^ current Section £^spatcva5^^
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mudavathu Bikari Naik
Seshi Bushan Kumar, I.A.S., Principal Secretary, Water Resource Department, State of Andhra Pradesh
Shemsher Singh Rawat, I.A.S., Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning, State of Andhra Pradesh
E.E Suresh, Executive Engineer, R.W.S. and S. Division, Narsaraopet
Ravi Cheemalapati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
