Writ petition against the State of Andhra Pradesh dismissed as infructuous after petitioners' counsel submitted that the cause no longer survives; no order as to costs, miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010024392021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 1732/2021
Between:
Narnavaram Chowdamma and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.GP FOR SERVICES III
The Court made the following Order:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Paleri Jaya Chandra, learned counsel representing Sri Vijay Mathukumilli, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive, and it has become infructuous.
2
closed.
__________________________ Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J
BMS
Narnavaram Chowdamma and Others
The State Of Andhra Pradesh
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
