Special Original Jurisdiction Writ Petition challenging disciplinary action. Petitioner argued the cause no longer survives; respondent did not oppose. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
"
'ii ft.
^ l-sl BJ
J
d:
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14495 OF 2007
Between:
T.V.Satyanarayana, S/o.late Subbanna, aged 52 years, Conductor E.No.505224,APSRTC, Giddalur Depot Prakasam District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one inthe nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities with regard to initiating disciplinary action in issuing charge sheet No.02/95(11)/2007-GDLR dated 13.3.2007 issued by the 2nd respondent herein as illegal, arbitrary, and malafide in nature and consequently set aside the same.
4^
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP. NO: 18208 OF 2007)
Petition under Section 151 CPG praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuant to charge sheet dated 13.3.2007 in No.02/95(11)/2007-GDLR issued by the 2nd respondent herein pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the PetitioneriSRI. V. MALLIK
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: SRI.P. DURGA PRASAD SC FOR
APSRTC
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Writ Petition No. 14495 of 2007
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive, hence there is nothing to be adjudicated in the present Writ Petition.
- Sri M.Solomon Raju, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents does not oppose the same.
- Noting the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infractuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,
shall stand closed.
SD/- A. VIJAYA BABU
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFICER
- One CC to SRI V. MALLIK Advocate [OPUC]
- One CC to SRI P. DURGA PRASAD SC FOR APSRTC Advocate [OPUC]
- Three C.D Copies
Nm
MBT
HIGH COURT
DATED:29/01/2024
ORDER
WP.No.14495 of 2007
1 o 2 9 JUN 202'!
If
Tir Current Section . S'
DISMISSING THE WP AS
INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
•s
f
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to proceed with the Writ Petition despite the submission that the cause no longer survives.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
T.V. Satyanarayana
The APSRTC
The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Giddalur
Superintendent and Chief Medical officer, APSRTC
Sri G. Madhava Rao
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
