The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel submission that the cause of action no longer survives for adjudication. No order as to costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3310]
APHC010063502016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 14399/2016
Between:
Guntur Viswaswe Rao, and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.KRANTHI K VAKA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY (AP)
2.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER :
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. S. Karunakar, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication in the matter and became infructuous.
In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
_______________________________ DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
Dated: 04.12.2024.
KK
Guntur Viswaswe Rao
The State Of Andhra Pradesh
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
