Dismissed

M.Indira at M.Indiramma, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC18 Apr 2024WP/13823/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging illegal mutation of her father's name in revenue records against the respondents. The Court accorded permission to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed the same as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted permission to withdraw and Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

M.Indira at M.Indiramma, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh — Property and Title | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 13823 OF 2023

¶6

Between:

¶7

M.Indira @ M.Indiramma, aged 65 years, W/o Late Mullaguru Raghupathi, Occupation.House Wife, D.No.2-70, M.K.Naidu Colony, Annamaiah Nagar, Sai Nagar, Tirupati, Tirupati District. Andhra Pradesh - 517501.

¶8

...Petitioner

¶9

AND

¶10

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,^Revenue Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District-522237 .

¶11

The District Collector, O/o District Collectorate, Chittoor, Chittoor District -517001.

¶12

The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o the Revenue Divisional Office, Vellore Road, Chittoor, Chittoor District -517001.

¶13

The Tahsildar, O/o The Tahsildar, Puthalapattu Mandal, Puthalapattu Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh - 517124.

¶14

The Sub -Registrar, O/o Sub Registrar's Office, Pakala, Chittoor District Andhra Pradesh - 517112

¶15

...Respondents

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the 4th respondent in not responding to the representation dt.08.05.2023 to reinstate the name of my father in place of my brother and his family members which were mutated by the way of illegal mutation is arbitrary, illegal, un-constitutional, violation of

¶17

Natural Justice and violation of Articles 14, 16, 21 and Article 300 A of the constitution of India and subsequently direct the 4th respondent to reinstate the name of my father in revenue records and also direct the 5th respondent not to entertain any registrations related to the Sy.Nos.289/1D, 292/2B, 295/1 IB, 295/3B, 295/9B, 296/2, 318/1, 318/5, 319, 320/2A, 333/3A, 334/3, 335/3, 336/1, 336/3, 337/1, 337/2A, 337/2B, 337/2C, 338/2, 338/3, 338/4A, 339/2, 339/4, 339/5A, 340/1, 341/2, 342/C, 343/2, 344/1, 345/D, 347, 348/A, 486/1, 488/2A, 490/1 A/1, 490/2A, 493/3, 494/1 A, 496/1, 497/1, 498/C, 510/1, 511/3, 512/1, 513/2, 513/3, 514/1, 515/3, 516/1, 517/3, 518/IB, 519/1, 519/9A, 520/2, 521/2, 522/1, 522/6, 523/1, 523/2, 525/1 A, 531/IB an extent of Ac.19.18 cents and Sy.Nos.487, 488/IB, 495 an extent of Ac.4.88 cents at Yerracheruvupalli Village, Puthalapattu Mandal, Chittoor District and Sy.Nos.421/1A, 422, 426/1A, 427/1,438/2A, 438/2B, 438/2C, 812/1 and 517/2, 521/5, 522 and 525 an extent of Ac.1.94 cents at Paturu Village, Puthalapattu Mandal, Chittoor District.

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 to stay the illegal^{mutationofthe} undivided joint family ancestral properties of the petitioner and subsequently direct the 5*^ respondent not to entertain any further transactions related to the Sy.Nos.289/1D, 292/2B, 295/1 IB, 295/3B, 295/9B, 296/2, 318/1, 318/5, 319, 320/2A, 333/3A, 334/3, 335/3, 336/1, 336/3, 337/1, 337/2A, 337/2B, 337/2C, 338/2, 338/3, 338/4A, 339/2, 339/4, 339/5A, 340/1, 341/2, 342/C, 343/2, 344/1, 345/D, 347, 348/A, 486/1, 488/2A, 490/1 A/1, 490/2A, 493/3, 494/1A, 496/1, 497/1, 498/C, 510/1, 511/3, 512/1, 513/2, 513/3 514/1 515/3, 516/1, 517/3, 518/IB, 519/1, 519/9A, 520/2, 521/2, 522/1, 522/6, 523/1, 523/2, 525/1 A, 531/IB an extent of Ac.19.18 cents and Sy.Nos.487, 488/IB, 495 an extent of Ac.4.88 cents at Yerracheruvupalli Village, Puthalapattu Mandal, Chittoor District and Sy.Nos.421/1A, 422, 426/1A,

¶20

427/1, 438/2A, 438/2B, 438/2C, 812/1 and 517/2, 521/5, 522 and 525 an extent of Ac. 1.94 cents at Paturu Village, Puthalapattu Mandal, Chittoor District.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D.KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE

¶22

The Court made the following order:

¶23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH; AMARAVATI

¶24

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI

¶25

WRIT PETITION No.13823 of 2023

¶26

M. Indira @ M. Indiramma, aged 65 years, W/o. Late Mullaguru Raghupathi, Occupation; House Wife, D.No.2-70, M.K.Naidu Colony, Annamaiah Nagar, Sai Nagar, Tirupati, Tirupati District, Andhra Pradesh-517501.

¶27

...Petitioner

¶28

Versus

¶29

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District and four others.

¶30

Respondents

¶31

Counsel for the petitioner : Sri D. Kishore Kumar Counsel for respondents ; GP for Revenue ORDER ■

¶32

In pursuance of Court Slip dated 03.04.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.

¶33

Permission is accorded.

¶34

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

¶35

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions^shall stand closed.

\ ■\

To,

//TRUE COPY//

One CC to Sri D Kishore Kumar, Advocate [OPUC

¶40

Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR

¶41

¶42

SECTION OFFICER

¶43

Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra^{Pradesh.[OUT]}

¶44

Two CD Copies

RAM

HIGH COURT

DATED:19/04/2024

ORDER

WP.No.13823 of 2023

DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

M.Indira at M.Indiramma, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Indira at M.Indiramma, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Annam Suvarchana, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Y Adi Reddy Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Thota Hanumantha Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Channama Reddy Hanumantha Reddy Vs The State of A.P

G.Tataji Vs TheGovernment of Andhra Pradesh

Aruna Restarent and Bar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh