Writ petition seeking ex gratia compensation for acquired land was withdrawn by the petitioner on counsel's request; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARA' ?RA
(Special Original Jurisdiction) .ff V.-. '. ^ <br>
FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1242 OF 2023
Between:
Channama Reddy Hanumantha Reddy, S/o PeddaTimma Reddy, Hindu, aged about 42 years. Ex. Service Man. R/o D.No.6/229, Garabaikottalu Village, Narpala Mandal, Ananthapuram District.
...PETITIONER : AND
...RESPONDENTS
a
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiaprayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,theHighCourtmay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction moreparticularlyoneinthe nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action, things anddeeds of Respondents in not paying the exgratia amount of Rs.1,55,00,000/-(@ 31,00,000/- per acer for the land in an extent of Ac.2.00cents in Survey No.504/1 and Ac.3.00 cents in Survey No.504/3 (total extent Ac.5.00 cents) in Kandukuru Village, Ananthapuram Mandal and District which is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, against to the PrinciplesofNaturalJusticeas well as contra to the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 and in violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300AoftheConstitutionof India, consequently direct the Respondents forthwithtopaytheexgratia amount of Rs.1,55,00,000/- to the Petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to direct the Respondents not to dispossessthe Petitioner from the land in an extent of Ac.2.00 cents in Survey No.504/1 and Ac.3.00 cents in Survey No.504/3 (total an extent of Ac.5.00cents)inKandukuru Village, Ananthapuram Mandal and District till thepaymentofexgratia amount to the Petitioner pending disposal of the mainWritPetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following ORDER:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.1242 of 2023
Channama Reddy Hanumantha Reddy, S/o. PeddaTimma Reddy, Hindu, aged about 42 years, Ex-Service Man, R/o. D.No.6/229, Garabaikottalu Village, Narpala Mandal, Ananthapuram District.
...Petitioner
Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, A.P. Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District and four others.
Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner ; Sri G. Narasimha Rao Counsel for respondents : GP for Revenue
ORDER
In pursuance of letter dated 12.04.2024, addressedtothe Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitionsshall stand closed.
SD/- K.SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC OFFICER
To,
PRK
HIGH COURT
DATED: 19/04/2024
ORDER
WP.No.1242 of 2023
X u ot'C 2r?^
o Co,
uufteni xjctwn
pat
"-rw'- — —
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Channama Reddy Hanumantha Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The District Collector, Ananthapuramu
The Land Acquisition cum Joint Collector, Ananthapuramu
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ananthapuramu
The Tahsildar, Ananthapuram Mandal
Subba Reddy Satti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
