Writ petition sought a mandamus directing police to consider the petitioner's representations and arrest accused A1 to A6 in FIR No. 20/2024 registered under various IPC sections. Counsel sought permission to withdraw; the court permitted and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER i!| TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR |
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHU
WRIT PETITION NO: 13127 OF 2024
Between:
Smt Komatiguntia Jyothi, W/o Komatiguntia Rueben Rao Aged 30 Years, R/o Adhinarayana Reddy Nagar, Backside of Rajarajeswari Temple, Kovuru Road, Kandukuru, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh, India, Pin Code. 523105.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to take into the consideration of the
petitioner and declaring the action of the 3^^ respondentnotconsideringthe representation or application of the petitioner forarrestoftheACCUSEDA1 TO ACCUSED A6 involved in the CR.N0.20‘/2024 or FIR.NO.20/2024 offences had registered under section 420, 107, 120,191,192,193,194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 306, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 506R/W34oftheIndian Penal Code, 1860 against the ACCUSED A1 TO ACCUSED A6 registered the FIR ( FIRST INFORMATION REPORT ) on the date of 13-02-2024 ( One Three Zero Two Two Zero Two Four) till the presentdatewithoutarrest of the ACCUSED A1 TO ACCUSED A6 involved in the CR.NO.20/2024or FIR.NO.20/2024 as the same is highly illegal arbitraryunconstitutionaland violation of the Article 14, Article 19 and Article21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd -respondent to consider the representation or application of the petitioner forarrestoftheACCUSEDA1 TO ACCUSED A6 involved in the CR.NO.20/2024 or FIR.NO.20/2024 offences had registered under section 420, 107, 120,191,192,193,194, 195, 196, 197 198, 306 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 506R/W34oftheIndian Penal Code, 1860 against the ACCUSED A1 TO ACCUSED A6 registered the FIR ( FIRST INFORMATION REPORT ) on the date of 13-02-2024 ( One Three Zero Two Two Zero Two Four) and arrest theACCUSEDA1TO ACCUSED A6 involved in the CR.NO.20/2024 or FIR.NO.20/2024 within one week.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Fligh Court may be pleased to direct the 3^^ respondent to consider the representation or application of the petitioner dated 20-05-2024, 29-05-2024forarrestofthe ACCUSED A1 TO ACCUSED A6 involved in the CR.NO.20/2024 or FIR.NO.20/2024 offences had registered under section420,107,120,191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 306, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 506 RA/V34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the ACCUSEDA1 TO
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. GOURAVARAPU VENKATALEELA
SUNDARAM
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
/
APHC010263532024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3368]
THURSDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 13127/2024
Between:
Komatiguntia Jyothi ...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.GOURAVARAPU VENKATA LEELA SUNDARAM
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is
filed for the following relief:
‘‘to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamustotake into the consideration of the petitioner and declaringthe action of the 3rd respondent not considering the representation or application of the petitioner forarrestof the A1 to A6 Involved in the Crime No.20/2024 or FIR
2
No. 20/2024 offences had registered under sections 420, 107, 120, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 306, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 506 R/W 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the A1 to A6 registered the FIRon the date of 13.02.2024 till the present date withoutarrest of the A1 to A6 involved in the Crime No.20/2024 or FIR No. 20/2024 as the same is highly illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and violation of the Article 14 Article 19 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3"^ respondent to considerthe representation or application of the petitioner forarrestof the A1 to A6 involved in the Crime No.20/2024 or FIR No. 20/2024 offences had registered under sections 420, 107, 120, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 306, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 506, R/W 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the A1 to A6 registered the FIRon the date of 13.02.2024 and arrest the A1 to A6 involved in the Crime No. 20/2024 or FIR No. 20/2024 within one week...”
- Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permissionofthisCourt to withdraw the Writ Petition.
- Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the State is present.
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
/
3
' (
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, ifany,pendingin
/
\
this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTI FICER
To,
AL
HIGH COURT
DATED: 12/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.13127 of 2024
andt;^
i?
m
g I 2 SEP 202'! Co
3' . Current Section * ^
S*£^SPATCHt2iV^
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police should be directed to arrest A1 to A6 in FIR No. 20/2024 despite the petitioner's representations.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Komatiguntia Jyothi
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Superintendent of Police, Ongole Town
The Station House Officer, Kandukuru Town Police Station
B V L N Chakravarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
