This is a single-paragraph order where the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Petition No. 13030 of 2012 on the merits as infructuous without awarding costs.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
X
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION NO: 13030 OF 2012
Between:
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents 1 and 2 in cancelling the documents of title including the link ^ petitioner's family as also the pending document No. P/148/2010, dated 30-11-2010 of GPA vide order dated 16-01-2012 as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutbnal and to set aside the same holding that the is without jurisdiction aZ^'p^aTsed^exTarte^^^ ^ respondent, dated 16-01-2012
j.A. NO: 1 OF 2012rWPMP. NO: 16258 OF 201?)
th. the circumstances stated in t^he affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to ^ORWNl /pZnfomZ H Proceedings of the 2"'' respondentinRO ^OB)/KNL/P148/2010, dated 16-01-2012, pending disposalofthepresentWrit
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 21001 OF
Between:
B. Venkateshwara Reddy, S/o. B. Venkata Reddy. Aged about 54 Years, Occ Journalism. R/o. H.No.45/115-1, N.R. Nagar, Kurnool. ...PETITIONER/PROPOSED RESPONDENT AND
. ^ ...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 3. The Commissioner & Inspector General, Stamps & Registration, Golkonda X Roads, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2^12 in Wp’No"l3030°or2otf ^PMP No. 16258 of
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI J. U. M. V. PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : GP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 :SRI BABUJI TENNETI
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION No. 130^0 of 2012
JUDGMENT:-
Sri J.U.M.V.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition has been rendered infructuous. He prays that the petition be dismissed as such.
infructuous.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any
pending, shall also stand closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:11/03/2024
ORDER
WP.No.13030 of 2012
O
ar o
■\o 0 2 APR 202^1 m
Section
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
_5rJ
Businessman (H.No 45/185-35-402)
K. Rajani
Commissioner & Inspector General, Stamps & Registration
Joint Sub-Registrar-1, RO (OB) Kurnool
Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
