Civil revision petition under the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act challenging a Rent Control Appellate Tribunal order. With no representation for the petitioners on successive dates, the High Court dismissed the revision petition for want of prosecution, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3*^
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 246 OF 2024
Between:
...Petitioner
AND
Kudupudi Sai, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged 57 years, Occ: Business, D.No. 45-1-2, Bridge Down, Near Yanam Bus Satnd, Jagannaickpur, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
...Respondent
Petition under Section 22 of A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act 1960, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to Petitioners beg to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition against the Order Dated 07.10.2020 in R.C.A.No.4/2020 on the file of the Court of the Rent Control Appellate Tribunal-cum-Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dt. 07-10-2020, passed in R.C.A. 4 of 2020, on the file of the court of the Rent Controller-cum-PrincipalSenior Civil Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District by confirming the order passed in
R.C.C.4 of 2018, dt. 13-11-2019, on the file of the court of the Rent Controller-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada,EastGodavari
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIVA RAMA KRISHNA KOLLURU
Counsel for the Respondents: —
The Court made the following: ORDER
r
APHC010027072024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3299]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 246/2024
Between:
Kada Bulli Abbulu and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
Kudupudi Sai
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.SIVA RAMA KRISHNA KOLLURU
Counsel for the Respondent:
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
No representation for the petitioners.
- On 16.02.2024 also there was no representation. The following order
was passed:
No representation.
- On the ground of pendency of the petition, the proceedings
pending before the Court shall not be adjourned.”
- Today also there is no representation and no requestonbehalfofthe petitioner’s counsel.
- The civil revision petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. No
order as to costs.
SD/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Civil 1. The Rent Control Appellate Tribunal-cum-Principal Senior Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District (with recordsifany) 2. One CC to Sri. Siva Rama Krishna Kolluru, Advocate[OPUC] 3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of A.P.atAmaravathi. 4. Three CD Copies
PR
sree
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:07/03/2024
ORDER
CRP.No.246 of 2024
m
Cor
21, WN JWii
aeciio*' ^
vV-
DISMISSING THE CRP FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kada Bulli Abbulu
Kada Rambabu
Kudupudi Sai
Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
