The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 12071 of 2011 challenging actions related to the appointment of pump operators as arbitrary and illegal, for non-prosecution.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 12071 OF 2011
Between:
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in issuing the impugned Memo R.C.No.687/2011-B2(Pt), dated 16.04.2011 and the consequential proceedings R.C.No.1/Contract/2011 dated
the same.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2011fWPMP. NO: 14755 OF 2011)
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. S SATYAM REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: M/s CH VEDAVANI
The Court made the following order:
APHC010111012011
0£0 COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457] 0L^ (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12071/2011
Between:
K. Subramanyam and Others ...PETITIONER{S)
AND The District Panchayat Officer and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S); 1.S SATYAM REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.CH VEDAVANI
2.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV
The Court made the following Order:
Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there was no representation for the petitioner.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shall
stand closed.
SD/- U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SE N OFFICER
To,
GSC
HIGH COURT DATED:08/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.12071 of 2011
DISMISSING OF THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K. Subramanyam
G. Madhusudhan Reddy
The District Panchayat Officer, Chittoor
The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Tirupathi
The Panchayat Secretary, Avilala Gram Panchayat
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
