The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a writ petition challenging the bifurcation of an F.P. shop. The court held the petition abated due to the death of the petitioner after notice was sent but returned unserved.
Writ petition dismissed as abated due to death of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 11976 OF 2018
Between:
Vavilapalli Satyam Naidu, S/o Late Krishnam Naidu, Aged 76 years, Permanent F.P.Shop dealer Burada Village, Regidi Amadalavalasa Mandal Srikakulam District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
aT" Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may ^ be pTeased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or ini ; g^i%ction declaring the impugned order passed bythe3rdrespondent i ^^c,l>ib. 218/2015 S4 Dated 28.01.2018 in bifurcating the petitioner's F.P i, shop ’and consequential proceeding Rc. No. 800/2017/C.S/ dated 03.02.2018 issued by the 4th respondent appointing the 7th respondent as in-charge dealer to the newly sanctioned FP Shop of the Burada-ll Regidi Amadalavalasa Mandal Srikaulam District is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in contravention of the G.O.Ms No.52 dt 18.12.2008 and hence liable to be set aside the same.
TV aT"
lA NO: 1 OF 2Q1«
Petition under Section 151' CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the orders of the 3rd respondent passed in Rc.No. 218/2015 S4 Dated 28.01.2018 and consequential proceedings Rc. No. 800/2017/C.S/ dated 03.02.2018 issued by the 4th respondent appointing the 7th respondent as in-charge F P shop dealer and releasing stocks to the newly created FP Shop Burada-ll, Regidi Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakuram District pending disposal of the writ petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2Q1«
Between:
... Petitioners/Respondents
AND
. Respondents/Respondents Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 27.4.2018 made in lA.No. 1/2018 in WP.No. 11976/2018.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. T SOWMYA
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K PURUSHOTHAM
The Court made the following: ORDER
f I
APHC010268892018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3311]
MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 11976/2018
Between: Vavilapalli Satyam Naidu
...PETITIONER
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner: IGeddam Satish Babu
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.K Purushotham
2.GP for Civil Supplies (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of ConstitutionofIndiaisfiledforthe following relief:
“...to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the impugned order passedbythe 3rd respondent in Rc.No.218/2015 S4 Dated 28.01.2018 in bifurcating the petitioners F P shop and consequential proceeding Rc No 800/2017/C.S/ dated 03.02.2018 issuedby the 4th respondent appointing the 7‘^ respondent asincharge dealer to the newly sanctioned FP Shop of the Burada-11 Regidi Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikaulam District is illegal,
^■0
2
BSB,J W.P.No.ll976of2018
arbitrary, unconstitutional and in contravention of the G.O.Ms.No.52 dt.18.12.2008 and hence liable to be setaside the sanne ...
In view of the death of the writ petitioner, the writpetitionisclosedas abated. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall standclosed.
To,
Sd/- P.U.V.BHASKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISJRAR //TRUE COPY// SEdr^JOFFICER /
TF
\ \
HIGH COURT
DATED: 14/10/2024
ORDER
WP.No.11976 of 2018
ANO^
^ 1 2 MAR 2C:5
. Current Section
5 5 I I I
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS ABATED, WITHOUT COSTS
I
Vavilapalli Satyam Naidu
State of Andhra Pradesh
B S BHANUMATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
